|Mike Smith headed a team that helped
craft Afghanistan's employment and labor code.
Posted March 5, 2004
American Attorney Team Crafts Afghanistan's
Labor and Employment Law
Not many people can say they've written the laws of a country from
the ground up—but that's what one team of American lawyers is
doing in Afghanistan, a country that burned its laws along with other
books under the Taliban regime. As part of an American Bar Association
project to help draft a commercial code for the transitional Afghan
government, attorney Mike Smith and law professor Rip
Verkerke worked to craft the nation's new employment and labor
code. They discussed their experience at a Virginia
Employment and Labor Law Association lunch March 4 in Caplin Pavilion.
“Labor and employment laws really do give a good indication
of what value you attach to individuals in your society,” said
Smith, who worked pro bono in Afghanistan with the aid of his law firm,
Dechert, LLP. Smith said his experience made him optimistic about the
country's potential for reform. “There are a lot of things wrong
with the country that have to be addressed, but there are also a lot
of good things about the country,” he said.
Smith heard about the project from a colleague who emigrated from
Afghanistan after her father, a resistance leader against the Soviet
Union, was executed by Soviet forces. The U.N. and ABA asked her to
get involved in women's rights issues in the country, as part of Dechert's
pro bono effort there. Smith offered to help, and soon found himself
named team leader in charge of drafting the employment and labor law
code. Smith asked Verkerke, along with a University of Texas law professor
and other Dechert lawyers, to join his team. Verkerke worked on wrongful
termination, employment contracts, and whistleblowing while Smith focused
on labor and union laws.
Smith said in crafting the laws they faced cultural obstacles as well
as a lack of resources.
“We had some difficulty in terms of ascertaining what laws were
in effect in Afghanistan, or whether any laws were in effect in Afghanistan
in regards to employment and labor,” he said. “Most of
the judges, such as they are... had no law book....[They] made decisions
as they saw fit.”
Smith said they wanted to address several issues in the new laws,
including the status of unions, wrongful termination, employment discrimination,
wages and hours, and workplace health and safety. They discovered that
the country had once based their legal system on the Napoleonic code.
Afghanistan had a close relationship with Egypt in the mid-1970s and
adopted their code; Egypt had founded their laws on the code because
the French had occupied the country in the early 1800s.
|Rip Verkerke said translation was
the biggest obstacle facing the laws' drafters.
One of the biggest obstacles for the team was translation, Verkerke
said. When he first read the English-language translation of the Dari-language
labor code, it was almost incomprehensible. Also, the lawmakers had
to keep in mind “what's the reality on the ground.” Verkerke
noted that the “woeful” state of the judicial infrastructure
made it difficult to find a basis for new laws or to expect enforcement
The new laws needed to facilitate transition and change, Verkerke
said, and he tried to avoid highly bureaucratic, complicated, restrictive
provisions. On the other hand, the extreme level of poverty in the
nation means “a social safety net is quite important.”
American labor and employment laws were too complicated to use in
Afghanistan. “You probably need to think from the ground up,” he
Illiteracy, at an estimated 90 percent in Afghanistan, was also a
substantial obstacle. “That makes written law and written documents
inaccessible to a large portion of the population.”
Many judges in the country are Islamic clerics, who often can't read
themselves and also present barriers to enforcement. Political forces
also shaped the way they wrote the law, Verkerke said, adding that
the law drafters “are in a sense at the mercy of their hosts.”
“I think there's some real prospect that this project will be
ignored” or be ineffective outside of major cities, Verkerke
said. “But I think it's worth a chance and certainly worth the
Smith said he knew nothing about Afghanistan or Islam when he embarked
on the project, but learned how crucial it was to visit the country
to understand both how to craft laws and how to work with officials
there in fine-tuning them. He spent eight days in Kabul, a bustling
city of 2.2 million, and learned the effects of 25 years of war on
the country. Bullet holes riddle government buildings; many of the
people were single or double amputees because of land mines; the maternity
and infant mortality rates are among the highest in the world. Outside
Kabul and other major cities, the society has changed little since
the Middle Ages. “Those are the realities that you deal with.”
The government officials they worked with had few resources; many
were ex-patriots who gave up comfortable lives in Europe or the United
States to make $50 a month in Kabul.
Despite their poverty, Afghan leaders placed great faith in legal
reform. After asking the Minister of Labor whether he wanted to base
the new laws on those of surrounding countries, Smith got an “emphatic ‘no'” via
e-mail. “He said point-blank [that] those laws are not sufficiently
progressive for what we want to achieve in Afghanistan.”
Instead the drafters looked at laws from Cambodia and Vietnam, countries
that also recently recovered from extended periods of war, as well
as Egypt and Jordan.
Smith said when he showed the Labor Minister his draft proposal on
employment discrimination, which included prohibitions against discrimination
based on gender, race, and tribal affiliation, the minister replied
that he wanted “the broadest possible protection for our people”—including
protection against religious discrimination.
Smith said he was very naïve about the role of women as well,
and pointed out that before the Taliban regime, 40 percent of attorneys
and doctors were women. “I think there's a tendency in the U.S.
to look at the Islamic world as some sort of monolith, and that is
not the case.”
The team survived an attempt by a consulting firm working for USAID
to eject them from the country; the firm wanted to win a multi-million
dollar contract to do what Smith's team was doing for free. Smith also
criticized some NGOs for acting more like travel agencies instead of
integrating their workers into the country and helping its people.
When Smith met with Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president recognized
the importance of creating a system of law to protect people and attract
foreign and domestic investment.
The only concern about American involvement “was that we would
prematurely disengage.” Smith said he got a reality check when
the Labor Minister asked him whether he would come back after his first
visit. He did return, with his daughter, who accompanied him as an
assistant but wore a head kerchief to honor the culture's traditions—although
Smith pointed out that more and more women are going without.
The laws the team crafted are currently being fine-tuned by the interim
government; after the team goes over the draft one more time, it will
be forwarded to Karzai's cabinet, which will implement it by decree.
Enforcement will likely be difficult, with only 10 practicing attorneys
in Kabul. “You're going to have to create a legal profession
to represent people who are seeking enforcement of the laws.” New
courtrooms are housed in compounds, and lawyers and judges live there
for security reasons.
Smith predicted an increasing struggle between the executive and judiciary
branches, the latter of which is made up of mostly conservative religious
clerics. The country's Supreme Court chief justice—who declared
the Internet and satellite television “an instrument of Satan”—has
already sniped at parts of the Constitution. Smith predicted, however,
that the traditionalist view will ultimately lose out.
“The most powerful instrument we have, if you want to call it
propaganda, is CNN. It is everywhere,” he said, and it shows
our country's values, good or bad. “I don't see how the traditionalists
can resist that tide of information.”
Asked whether working on Afghanistan's new laws gave them any insight
into American employment and labor laws, Verkerke said he began to
wonder in cases of wrongful termination whether creating a mandatory
severance pay system to cushion the impact of losing a job might be
better than the current method of inquiring into employers' motives
for firing an employee. “We just think it's natural because that's
the way it's been” for many years, he said.
Smith urged students to look for such pro bono opportunities in their
careers. “There's no better time to start than in law school,” he
• Reported by M. Wood