Text-only version
LawWeb
Directory
Contact Us
E-Mail
Events
Media Guide
C'ville
UVA
Search All...
Directory
Library
Course Info
Media Guide
About
Academics
Admissions
Students
Faculty
Library
Alumni
&
Giving
Public Service
Career Services
News
Academics
Academics
Concentrations
Combined-Degree Programs
Clinical Programs
Academic Journals
Current Courses
All Courses
J.D. Curriculum
Academic Policies
Academic Calendar
Student Records
External Studies Program
Law Studies Abroad
Institutes and Centers
Degree Programs
Awards and Honors
The Honor System
Curricular Programs
Law & Business
International Law
Legal and Constitutional History
Criminal Justice
Human Rights
Center for the Study of Race and Law
Environmental and Land Use Law
Immigration Law
Intellectual Property
Health Law
Law and Humanities
Fall 2009
Law No.: LAW7635
Sched. No.: 109835594
Legal Theory in Europe and the United States: A Comparative Analysis
Section 1
X
Duxbury, Neil T.
Administrative Information:
Days, Times (Room):
MTWR, 0820-0950 (WB129)
Credits:
1
Type:
Lecture - short course
Capacity:
20
**This information is current as of
11/24/2009 06:49:08 AM
**
Current Enrollment:
12
**This information is current as of
11/24/2009 06:49:08 AM
**
Syllabus:
View Syllabus
(requires LawWeb account)
Course Description:
This course meets September 7 - 17.
Have American and European legal theorists tended to raise the same sorts of questions about law? If they have not, what are the differences in perspective? Twentieth-century European legal theory was dominated by the question of what gives law its validity, whereas American legal theorists have been preoccupied with rather different questions. Yet in Europe and the United States, legal theorists have ultimately found themselves worrying about much the same set of problems.
This short course is structured around two of these problems. The first of these concerns the notion of law as an autonomous entity. The American realist ideas that law is a form of politics, and that law might be profitably studied from the perspectives of other disciplines, took a long time to take hold in Europe. But what did Europeans do instead? The starting-point for the course is European legal positivism, the basic argument behind which is that the reason that laws are binding on citizens has little if anything to do with the moral content of those laws. We will consider the positivist approach alongside American legal realism.
The second problem on which this course focuses – a problem that neither the European positivists nor the American legal realists handled particularly well – is that of what makes for good judicial decision-making. In this part of the course we will see how Europeans and Americans have adopted similar approaches to this problem, and how they have developed similarly controversial arguments.
The course is designed to introduce American law students to a body of literature that they are unlikely to encounter elsewhere in their studies. It is anticipated that the course will provide students with broader perspectives on some of the problems encountered in other parts of their syllabus, and that it will familiarize them with arguments and literature that they might draw upon when studying, and completing assignments for, other law courses.
ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENT: Attendance at all class sessions is expected
COURSE REQUIREMENT: Examination