Text-only version
LawWeb
Directory
Contact Us
Email
News
&
Events
Media Guide
C'ville
UVA
About
Academics
Admissions
Students
Faculty
Library
Alumni
&
Giving
Public Service
Career Services
Academics
Concentrations
Dual-Degree Programs
Clinical Programs
Academic Journals
Current Courses
J.D. Curriculum
Academic Policies
Academic Calendar
Student Records
Externships
Law Studies Abroad
Institutes and Centers
Degree Programs
Awards and Honors
The Honor System
Curricular Programs
Law & Business
Law and Public Service
International Law
Legal and Constitutional History
Criminal Law
Human Rights
Center for the Study of Race and Law
Environmental and Land Use Law
Immigration Law
Intellectual Property
Health Law
Public Policy and Regulation
Law and Humanities
Animal Law
Spring 2013
Law No.: LAW7694
Sched. No.: 113219337
New Frontiers in Clinical Ethics and Law (SC)
Section 1
X
Bonnie, Richard J.
Chen, Donna T.
Administrative Information:
During SIS enrollment, check
on SIS
for real-time enrollment numbers
Days, Times (Room):
MTWR, 1600-1730 (WB119)
Credits:
1
Type:
Lecture - short course
Capacity:
16
**This information is current as of
05/20/2013 06:17:38 AM
**
Current Enrollment:
4
**This information is current as of
05/20/2013 06:17:38 AM
**
Course Description:
This short course meets Monday-Thursday, 4:00-5:30 p.m., February 18-28.
As the population ages and medical advances allow early diagnosis of dementia, who is best suited to provide professional guidance for advance planning—doctors or lawyers or someone else? Does having a family member or other significant person intimately involved in medical care for individuals with cognitive impairment or other mental health problems enhance or detract from patient-centered care? Should individuals who lack capacity for medical decision-making be allowed to refuse treatment and should clinicians be allowed to treat over protest? What if they refuse treatment in advance while they have decisional capacity? What if they consent in advance to treatment over later objection? Should they be allowed to consent in advance to being enrolled in research?
As medical advances allow prevention of dementia and these same advances serve to enhance normal cognitive functioning, should physicians be allowed or prohibited by law from prescribing for reasons of enhancement? Or should the law be silent on this issue and allow professional norms to guide practice in this area?
This intensive interdisciplinary experience brings medical students and law students together for two-weeks each spring to explore topical issues at the frontier of clinical care, law, and ethics through multidisciplinary readings, immersion experiences, hands-on interdisciplinary group projects, and in-depth discussions. By working together within and across disciplinary boundaries, students will learn how other professionals think, discuss ideas across disciplinary boundaries, and create interdisciplinary ways of communicating with the general public and policymakers. Together, future lawyers and doctors will assess challenges facing tomorrow’s healthcare system; explore various resources available to address these challenges; and propose solutions. The session offered in spring 2013 address specific challenges like the ones described above.
COURSE REQUIREMENT: Group projects, class presentation, and a short paper