Text-only version
LawWeb
Directory
Contact Us
Email
News
&
Events
Media Guide
C'ville
UVA
About
Academics
Admissions
Students
Faculty
Library
Alumni
&
Giving
Public Service
Career Services
Academics
Concentrations
Dual-Degree Programs
Clinical Programs
Academic Journals
Current Courses
J.D. Curriculum
Academic Policies
Academic Calendar
Student Records
Externships
Law Studies Abroad
Institutes and Centers
Degree Programs
Awards and Honors
The Honor System
Curricular Programs
Law & Business
Law and Public Service
International Law
Legal and Constitutional History
Criminal Law
Human Rights
Center for the Study of Race and Law
Environmental and Land Use Law
Immigration Law
Intellectual Property
Health Law
Public Policy and Regulation
Law and Humanities
Animal Law
Fall 2012
Law No.: LAW7697
Sched. No.: 112821607
Supreme Court Decisionmaking: A Case Study (SC)
Section 1
X
Epps, Daniel S.
Twomey, Katherine I.
Administrative Information:
During SIS enrollment, check
on SIS
for real-time enrollment numbers
Days, Times (Room):
MTWR, 0820-0950 (WB129)
Credits:
1
Type:
Lecture - short course
Capacity:
16
**This information is current as of
05/23/2013 06:18:36 AM
**
Current Enrollment:
16
**This information is current as of
05/23/2013 06:18:36 AM
**
Syllabus:
View Syllabus
(requires LawWeb account)
Course Description:
This short course meets Monday-Thursday, 8:20-9:50 a.m., October 15-25.
This course will provide an introduction to decisionmaking in the Supreme Court of the United States through the lens of one pending case,
Bailey v. United States
.
Bailey
raises an interesting, open Fourth Amendment question: Whether police are allowed to detain someone while they search that person’s residence pursuant to a warrant, even though the person has left the premises. We will begin by examining the precedents leading to the issue in
Bailey
. We will also review some legal scholarship dealing with theoretical issues posed by the case. We will then focus on the mechanics of the case. First, we will examine how the Fourth Amendment issue was litigated in the district court and the appellate court. Then, we will turn to the certiorari stage briefing and review how other courts resolved the issue, using this as an opportunity to discuss the Supreme Court’s certiorari process more generally. We will then review the merits briefing, discussing the arguments and broader implications of a ruling either way. We hope to be able to offer the students an opportunity to attend the oral argument at the Supreme Court. We will conclude the course by discussing the opinion drafting process, and, in lieu of an exam, students will prepare draft opinions resolving the case.
ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENT: Attendance at all class sessions is required
COURSE REQUIREMENT: Paper required