Memory issues stemming from criminal trials that involve the reliability of eyewitnesses are well-known. However, the relevance of memory to law extends far beyond that context. This chapter describes the importance of, and concerns with, different facets of memory in a range of legal doctrine and processes. For example, in product liability cases, witness memory provides key evidence, but such civil cases differ in both the content of the memories and the procedures used to elicit them. In intellectual property cases, memory for trademarks and potential cryptomnesia (unconscious plagiarism) may be used in assessing liability. In contracts and negotiations, parties’ memory may be useful, or not, when trying to make sense of the content of an agreement. Prospective memory—that is, remembering to do tasks in the future—is relevant to liability for actions as diverse as injury resulting from not following product warnings to forgetting a child in the back seat of a car. And neurologically impaired memory has consequences for attributions of blame and guilt. The chapter also provides brief reviews of some recent research on memory’s involvement in investigations and in courtrooms (particularly in the United States), including eyewitness testimony, confessions, consequences of pretrial publicity and expert testimony, and the effectiveness of jury instructions for both disregarding evidence and improving juror decision-making. Throughout, the chapter illustrates relationships between the law and different facets of memory described in this handbook.

Citation
Barbara A. Spellman & Charles S. Weaver, Memory and the Law, in The Oxford Handbook of Human Memory, Two Volume Pack: Foundations and Applications, Oxford University Press, 2267–2293 (2024).
UVA Law Faculty Affiliations