Charles Barzun

Judging Progress: Roe, Casey and the idea of social change

PUBLISHER
The Point
DATE
2022-06-3
 

UVA Law Faculty Affiliations

Abstract

Ever since the recent leak of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s draft opinion in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case, the media’s focus has rightly been trained on what overruling Roe v. Wade would mean for abortion access in this country. That is unquestionably the most important issue at stake. But the draft opinion’s overruling of another abortion decision, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, raises a more general question about constitutional law that has drawn less attention: Does the occurrence (or absence) of social progress matter for interpreting the Constitution?

Citation

Charles Barzun, Judging Progress: Roe, Casey and the idea of social change, The Point (June 3, 2022).
 

More in This Category

  • Studies of federalism, especially in the United States, have mostly centered on state autonomy and the vertical relationship between the states and... MORE
  • Constitutional review is the power of a body, usually a court, to assess whether law or government action complies with the constitution. Originating... MORE
  • In 2018, Congress rightly highlighted the problem of sex trafficking, which is a moral abomination and vicious scourge. It condemned sites like... MORE