Interpreting the Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Co-author(s)

Oliver S. Thomas

Date

1994

Citation

Douglas Laycock & Oliver S. Thomas, Interpreting the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 73 Texas Law Review, 209–246 (1994).

UVA Law Faculty Affiliations

Douglas Laycock

Constitutional Law and Legal History

Center for the First Amendment

More in This Category

How to Legitimate the Prosecution of Politicians

Saikrishna Prakash

Ian Ayres

We propose the creation of a Prosecutor Jury—a mechanism designed to balance the need to hold politicians accountable for their crimes, and the need...

The One Remaining Identity the Supreme Court Is Willing to Protect

Craig Konnoth

There is one group that the court does not put into an identity straitjacket—those claiming religious exemptions.

Do Land Use Plans Affirmatively Further Fair Housing?

Moira O'Neill

Paavo Monkkonen

Michael Lens

...

The 1968 Fair Housing Act required local government recipients of federal money to take meaningful actions to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH...

The Supreme Court Just Dealt a Major Blow to Corporate Mandates

James Nelson

Micah J. Schwartzman

Elizabeth Sepper

On Thursday, the Supreme Court subtly transformed the rights of religious workers in America. Under the guise of “clarifying” a nearly 50-year-old...

Opinion: The Supreme Court is making religion an all-purpose excuse for ignoring the law

Looking for a federal law to be declared unconstitutional? Religion may well be your best bet -- and that's true regardless of how "real" your...

Religion as Disobedience

Xiao Wang

Religion today offers plaintiffs a ready path to disobey laws without consequence. Examples of such disobedience abound. In the past few years alone...

How To Fix Section 230

Danielle K. Citron

Section 230 is finally getting the clear-eyed attention that it deserves. No longer is it naive to suggest that we revisit the law that immunizes...

State Separation of Powers and the Federal Courts

Ann Woolhandler

The issue of state separation of powers generally is not one that the federal courts have had much occasion to address. Recent issues have arisen...

The Problem of “Relevant Experience”

Craig Konnoth

In their intriguing article “Bioethics and the Moral Authority of Experience,” Nelson and colleagues (2023) provide important insight into an...

The Perils and Promise of Public Nuisance

Leslie Kendrick

Public nuisance has lived many lives. A centuries-old doctrine defined as an unreasonable interference with a right common to the public, it is...

Remand Without Vacatur and the Ab Initio Invalidity of Unlawful Regulations in Administrative Law

John C. Harrison

An important administrative law doctrine developed by the lower federal courts, called remand without vacatur, rests on a mistaken premise. Courts...

Religious Freedom and Abortion

Richard C. Schragger

Micah J. Schwartzman

The demise of Roe v. Wade has raised a host of religious liberty questions that were submerged prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v...

The Cross, the Confederate, and the Constitution

Richard C. Schragger

Constitutional law has a great deal to say about what symbols are permitted in the public square. Somewhat baroque legal rules (sometimes created...

The Discipline of Rudy Giuliani and the Real Fraud of the 2020 Election

George M. Cohen

In Matter of Giuliani, the New York Appellate Division held that Rudy Giuliani’s knowingly false statements of fact during the period after the 2020...

The Respect for Marriage Act: Living Together Despite Our Deepest Differences

Douglas Laycock

Thomas C. Berg

Carl H. Esbeck

...

The recently enacted Respect for Marriage Act is important bipartisan legislation that will protect same-sex marriage should the Supreme Court...

How Can Procedural Reform Support Fair Share Housing Production? Assessing the Effects of California’s Senate Bill 35

Moira O'Neill

Ivy Wang

Land use regulation that constrains housing production risks social, economic, and environmental harm. California attempts to avoid these harms by...

The most disturbing aspect of Vanessa Bryant’s case

Danielle K. Citron

John C.P. Goldberg

Benjamin C. Zipursky

Vanessa Bryant’s recent verdict against the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s and Fire Departments represents a federal jury’s response to immoral and...

Cedar Point Nursery and the End of the New Deal Settlement

Julia D. Mahoney

In Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a California state regulation granting labor organizations a limited...