Mitu Gulati

Which States Have the Best (and Worst) High Courts?

CO-AUTHORS Stephen J. Choi and Eric A. Posner
PUBLISHER
University of Chicago Law and Economics Working Paper Series No. 405
DATE
2009
 

Abstract

This paper ranks the high courts of the fifty states, based on their performance during the years 1998-2000, along three dimensions: opinion quality (or influence as measured by out-of-state citations), independence (or non-partisanship), and productivity (opinions written). We also discuss ways of aggregating these measures. California and Delaware had the most influential courts; Georgia and Mississippi had the most productive courts; and Rhode Island and New York had the most independent courts. If equal weight is given to each measure, then the top five states were: California, Arkansas, North Dakota, Montana, and Ohio. We compare our approach and results with those of other scholars and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, whose influential rankings are based on surveys of lawyers at big corporations. 

 

 

 

Citation

Stephen J. Choi, G. Mitu Gulati & Eric A. Posner, Which States Have the Best (and Worst) High Courts?, University of Chicago Law and Economics Working Paper Series No. 405 (2009).
 

More in This Category