George Yin

Publicly Traded Partnerships, Closely Held Corporations, and Entity Classification for Tax Purposes

PUBLISHER
Taxes
DATE
2010
 

Abstract

This comment, presented as part of a November, 2009, tax program on publicly traded partnerships, argues for the adoption of two classification lines to facilitate the collection of tax attributable to business income. One line would separate public firms from private ones with the former, but not the latter, being made subject to an entity-level tax. This tax, which might be part of an integrated or classical income tax system, could be determined in a manner that takes advantage of the unique characteristics of public firms. The second line would separate private firms based on the tax profiles of their owners. Firms whose owners are all taxed in a comparable fashion could be provided with a somewhat simplified rule structure. All other private firms would be subject to a more rigorous, and possibly less flexible, set of pass through taxation rules. With this division, the IRS could concentrate its limited enforcement resources on the last group of firms, and policymakers could provide legislation focused on resolving the unique tax problems presented by those firms.

Citation

George K. Yin, Publicly Traded Partnerships, Closely Held Corporations, and Entity Classification for Tax Purposes, 88 Taxes 329-335 (2010).
 

More in This Category