John C. Jeffries, Jr.

Bakke Revisited

John C. Jeffries Jr.
PUBLISHER
Supreme Court Review
DATE
2003
SSRN
 

Abstract

In the Michigan affirmative action cases, the Supreme Court not only reaffirmed the result of the 1978 decision in Board of Regents of the University of California v. Allan Bakke, but specifically endorsed the opinion and reasoning of Justice Lewis Powell. At the time, Powell spoke for himself alone. None of his colleagues embraced his position, which was widely seen, by both liberals and conservatives, as internally contradictory and incoherent. Yet twenty-five years later, Powell carried the day. This essay explores the evolution of Powell's position from eccentric outlier to received wisdom and offers comments on the lessons that can be drawn from that experience. It is a preliminary draft of an essay that will appear, as edited, in the Supreme Court Review.

SSRN

Citation

John C. Jeffries Jr., <em>Bakke</em> Revisited, 2003 Supreme Court Review 1–25 (2003).
 

More in This Category

  • FOSTA's Mess

    In 2018, Congress rightly highlighted the problem of sex trafficking, which is a moral abomination and vicious scourge. It condemned sites like... MORE

  • Solidarity Federalism

    Studies of federalism, especially in the United States, have mostly centered on state autonomy and the vertical relationship between the states and... MORE

  • Models of Judicial Review

    Constitutional review is the power of a body, usually a court, to assess whether law or government action complies with the constitution. Originating... MORE