Do legal concepts alter how we understand the past and present? The jurisprudence of race suggests that they do. For several decades, federal courts have distorted America’s racial history by relying on a misleading legal conception of discrimination. The concept of animus has helped courts recharacterize U.S. racial discrimination as having occurred long ago, inflicting distant harms that have long since been cured or simply dissipated. Based on such depictions, courts have increasingly rejected government attempts to use race-based measures to redress past discrimination. In this Essay, I argue that a long-term movement opposing remedies for racial inequality has culminated in the present moment of near-absurdity—when Jim Crow itself is not sufficiently cognizable as “discrimination” to warrant repair. That movement against remedies is deeply intertwined with courts’ embrace of the concept of “animus,” which restricts the forms of harm that the courts will recognize as illegitimate discrimination. Animus doctrine has helped courts render past discrimination invisible, irrelevant, and unrecognizable. In doing so, the doctrine makes it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to remedy the core wrongs of America’s past. While animus doctrine in recent decades has played a positive role in bringing about victories for the LGBTQ community and people with disabilities, I argue that the concept itself is a risky, unreliable foundation for lasting gains. The hunt for animus may easily distract from and undermine deeper social reform.
Citation
Joy Milligan, Animus and Its Distortion of the Past, 74 Alabama Law Review 725–753 (2023).
More in This Category
An upcoming Supreme Court case on Article III standing and disability presents critical questions about the future of litigation that promotes...
More
Long lines inside Bodo’s Bagels, congestion on Emmet Street and a seemingly endless stream of runners and scooters zooming past your car in early...
More
Matthew Waxman
Congress may want to prevent nuclear command and control from going fully autonomous. Would such a law be constitutional?
More
In our increasingly polarized society, claims that prosecutions are politically motivated, racially motivated, or just plain arbitrary are more common...
More
When federal judges are called on to adjudicate separation-of-powers disputes, they are not mere arbiters of the separation of powers. By resolving a...
More
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization , the Supreme Court distinguished between different kinds of reliance interests — some that would...
More
This story begins with one parent who took his demands for equal educational opportunity for his children all the way to the highest court of our land...
More
Life tenure for the federal judiciary doesn’t promote judicial independence or the development of law as the Framers expected, and should be repealed...
More
Contract law has one overarching goal: to advance the legitimate interests of the contracting parties. For the most part, scholars, judges, and...
More
Do legal concepts alter how we understand the past and present? The jurisprudence of race suggests that they do. For several decades, federal courts...
More
A new study shows that lower court judges, and especially conservatives, are using senior status as a loophole to ensure their replacement by a like...
More
A division exists between scholars who claim that Congress made only limited delegations to executive officials in the early Republic, and those who...
More
Quinta Jurecic
In 2018, Congress rightly highlighted the problem of sex trafficking, which is a moral abomination and vicious scourge. It condemned sites like...
More
Mark Tushnet
The idea of judicial dialogue entered into scholarly discussion in the late twentieth century and is used in connection with different phenomena at...
More
Erin F. Delaney
Studies of federalism, especially in the United States, have mostly centered on state autonomy and the vertical relationship between the states and...
More
This project is part of ALI’s ongoing revision of the Restatement Second of Torts. The Restatement Second recognized compensatory damages, injunctions...
More
An important administrative law doctrine developed by the lower federal courts, called remand without vacatur, rests on a mistaken premise. Courts...
More