Kenneth S. Abraham

Peril and Fortuity in Property and Liability Insurance

Tort & Insurance Law Journal

UVA Law Faculty Affiliations


This article concludes that the characteristic feature of insurance policies, their standard-form nature, strongly supports an interpretive approach that emphasizes the primacy of insurance policy language and relegates legal rules to a secondary position in the interpretive enterprise. For this reason, the courts should be wary of employing so-called rules regarding insuring against nonfortuitous loss. Rather, to determine whether there is coverage under an insurance policy whose provisions address the fortuity issue, the courts should apply the policy language.



Kenneth S. Abraham, Peril and Fortuity in Property and Liability Insurance, 36 Tort & Insurance Law Journal 777-802 (2001).

More in This Category

  • Who is the intended audience of a contract? A court, who may be called upon to resolve a dispute, is one audience. Another is commercial communities... MORE
  • The supply of human organs for transplantation might seem an unlikely place to begin thinking about entrepreneurship. After all, there is no... MORE
  • The requirement of harm has significantly impeded the enforcement of privacy law. In most tort and contract cases, plaintiffs must establish that... MORE