The human rights movement has spent considerable energy developing and promoting the adoption of both international and domestic legal prohibitions against torture. Empirical scholarship testing the effectiveness of these prohibitions using observational data, however, has produced mixed results. In this paper, we explore one possible mechanism through which these prohibitions may be effective: dampening public support for torture. Specifically, we conducted a survey experiment to explore the impact of international and constitutional law on public support for torture. We found that a bare majority of respondents in our control group support the use of torture, and that presenting respondents with arguments that this practice violates international law or constitutional law did not produce a statistically significant decrease in support. These findings are consistent with prior research suggesting, even in democracies, that legal prohibitions on torture have been ineffective.
Citation
Adam S. Chilton & Mila Versteeg, International Law, Constitutional Law, and Public Support for Torture, 3 Research & Politics 1–9 (2016).
More in This Category
Lee C. Buchheit
Lenders are perfectly free to decide for themselves whether, when, how, to whom and on what terms they will extend credit to a sovereign borrower. But...
More
An upcoming Supreme Court case on Article III standing and disability presents critical questions about the future of litigation that promotes...
More
Oona A. Hathaway
The Supreme Court’s recent expansion of the major questions doctrine has rocked administrative law, throwing into doubt executive agencies’ statutory...
More
Both theorists and courts commonly assume that high-dollar financial contracts between sophisticated parties are free of linguistic errors...
More
Lee C. Buchheit
The bill proposes a flawed and possibly unconstitutional reparations program and needs to be reworked to give Ukraine some chance at a viable post-war...
More
Matthew Waxman
Congress may want to prevent nuclear command and control from going fully autonomous. Would such a law be constitutional?
More
In our increasingly polarized society, claims that prosecutions are politically motivated, racially motivated, or just plain arbitrary are more common...
More
At the inception of a new and potentially transformative type of tax enforcement, this Article reviews the goals underlying the prohibition on state...
More
When federal judges are called on to adjudicate separation-of-powers disputes, they are not mere arbiters of the separation of powers. By resolving a...
More
Since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, the United States and its allies have searched for the best way to express their horror and dismay. At the level...
More
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization , the Supreme Court distinguished between different kinds of reliance interests — some that would...
More
This story begins with one parent who took his demands for equal educational opportunity for his children all the way to the highest court of our land...
More
Life tenure for the federal judiciary doesn’t promote judicial independence or the development of law as the Framers expected, and should be repealed...
More
Do legal concepts alter how we understand the past and present? The jurisprudence of race suggests that they do. For several decades, federal courts...
More
A new study shows that lower court judges, and especially conservatives, are using senior status as a loophole to ensure their replacement by a like...
More
States are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence systems to enhance their national security decision-making. The real risks that states will...
More
A division exists between scholars who claim that Congress made only limited delegations to executive officials in the early Republic, and those who...
More