Assessing the legitimacy of any legal system is hard, but especially if the system in question is the volatile and contested field of international law. Recognizing limits of space and my capabilities, I reframe the task for this chapter. Rather than defending or attacking the legitimacy of international law, it talks about how one might think about this issue. The chapter proceeds by breaking down the issue of legitimacy into a series of questions. Is international law a legal system? What are the sources of values and standards for assessing its legitimacy? Does contemporary practice of international law advance or retard the development of a legitimate legal system? It concludes with a brief discussion of areas for future research.
Citation
Paul B. Stephan, The Legitimacy of International Law, in Palgrave Handbook of International Political Theory, Palgrave Macmillan (2023).
More in This Category
Lee C. Buchheit
Lenders are perfectly free to decide for themselves whether, when, how, to whom and on what terms they will extend credit to a sovereign borrower. But...
More
Lee C. Buchheit
The bill proposes a flawed and possibly unconstitutional reparations program and needs to be reworked to give Ukraine some chance at a viable post-war...
More
At the inception of a new and potentially transformative type of tax enforcement, this Article reviews the goals underlying the prohibition on state...
More
Since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, the United States and its allies have searched for the best way to express their horror and dismay. At the level...
More
States are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence systems to enhance their national security decision-making. The real risks that states will...
More
The knowledge economy, a seeming wonder for the world, has caused unintended harms that threaten peace and prosperity and undo international...
More
National security review of corporate transactions has long been a relatively sleepy corner of regulatory policy. But as governments merge economic...
More
The roots of this book run through an article in this Journal almost forty years ago. Professor Iwasawa, as he was then, came to the University of...
More
In 2023, non-governmental organizations such as Human Rights Watch and Stop Killer Robots will continue their calls for a new international legal...
More
This casebook addresses the global dimension of civil procedure, and the conflicts that American law gives rise to in cross-border litigation...
More
If big data is a resource and therefore a potential target of armed conflict, what kinds of attacks justify an armed response and what are the rules...
More
Assessing the legitimacy of any legal system is hard, but especially if the system in question is the volatile and contested field of international...
More
Over the last thirty years, almost every time I stepped out of my narrow academic path to do something that, I hoped, was for the greater public good...
More
Lee C. Buchheit
All sovereign debt restructurings are inherently messy, expensive, exasperating, time-consuming and contentious. These are the familiar pathologies in...
More
This article develops a positive, decision-theoretical model of the logic that states use in drafting, negotiating, approving, and ratifying...
More
Economic and financial sanctions have become one of the most prominent tools of U.S. foreign policy. The relevant sanctions programs are complex and...
More
In this article, Mason explains how the OECD's proposed Pillar 2 global minimum tax rules induce cooperation by states, and how the proposal to enact...
More
Notwithstanding the efforts that have been made to pluralize the concept, constitutionalism continues to be identified closely with, and for many...
More