Bankruptcy offers a fresh start that frees individuals from crushing debt burdens. Many insolvent Americans are, however, simply too poor to afford bankruptcy. Filing for even the simplest type of bankruptcy costs around $1,800, with most of this money paid to attorneys who help complete more than twenty required forms and schedules. These forms verify that the debtor qualifies for relief and help divide the debtor’s estate among creditors, but for the large majority of debtors, this paperwork is unnecessary because the debtor easily qualifies for relief and has no assets to distribute. History offers a better model. Two centuries ago, the law granted release from debtor’s prison through the simple execution of a “poor debtor’s oath”—a short declaration that the debtor lacked substantial assets. For most debtors, modern bankruptcy law should require no more than an updated version of a poor debtor’s oath that provides relief unless creditors or their trustees are willing to pay some cost to challenge the oath’s validity. To discourage the wealthy from taking false oaths, Congress could sharply limit the exemptions available in the simplified procedure. Even dramatically smaller exemptions would protect all of the assets of the overwhelming majority of bankrupt debtors. By avoiding costly processes for debtors who obviously qualify for bankruptcy relief, a modern poor debtor’s oath could save hundreds of millions of dollars in transaction costs each year and greatly expand access to bankruptcy.
After several years of dramatic growth, ESG investing seems to have entered a period of retrenchment. While it is impossible to predict the future...
Gradualism should have won out in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, exerting gravitational influence on the majority and dissenters alike. In general...
On December 15, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued its decision in Illumina, Inc. v. FTC. Although the court vacated and...
On January 17, the Supreme Court heard arguments in what are potentially the most significant commercial law cases of the last decade. In the...
Lenders are perfectly free to decide for themselves whether, when, how, to whom and on what terms they will extend credit to a sovereign borrower. But...
There is a live debate going on over whether antitrust should take a broader view of the economics of market concentration. When antitrust reformers...
This casebook aspires to help students understand and think systematically about the techniques of statutory interpretation. It blends exposition with...
We examine the legal terms in the market for green bonds, debt instruments in which proceeds are earmarked, directly or indirectly, for projects with...
In an era defined by partisan rifts and government gridlock, many celebrate the rare issues that prompt bipartisan consensus. But extreme consensus...
The idea of institutionalism figures prominently in today’s debates about the role of federal courts in American democracy. For example, Chief Justice...
Consequential damages have been a cornerstone of contract doctrine since the broken crankshaft in Hadley v. Baxendale. And the Hadley rule is one of...
In this article, we examine the relations between risk, the choice of foreign or local contract terms (parameters), and maturity in the sovereign debt...
Long lines inside Bodo’s Bagels, congestion on Emmet Street and a seemingly endless stream of runners and scooters zooming past your car in early...
Engaging New Cases: The book uses fresh, timely cases in agency and partnership to show how business law is relevant in a variety of practices...
Over the past quarter century, Congress has enacted several major reforms for retirement plans and individual retirement accounts, usually with large...
The 1968 Fair Housing Act required local government recipients of federal money to take meaningful actions to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH...
Scores of lawsuits have pushed retirement plan sponsors to shorter, easier-to-navigate menus, but – as Ian Ayres and Quinn Curtis argue in this work –...