Compulsive Gambling and the Insanity Defense: United States v. Torniero and United States v. Lewellyn

Date

1984-4

Citation

Richard J. Bonnie, Compulsive Gambling and the Insanity Defense: <em>United States v. Torniero</em> and <em>United States v. Lewellyn</em>, Newsletter of the American Academy of Psychiatry & Law 5–8 (April, 1984).

UVA Law Faculty Affiliations

Richard J. Bonnie

Public Policy and Regulation

Center for Criminal Justice

Health Law

Family Law Center

More in This Category

The Counterintuitive Consequences of Sex Offender Risk Assessment at Sentencing

Megan T. Stevenson

Jennifer L. Doleac

Virginia adopted a risk assessment to help determine sentencing for sex offenders. It was incorporated as a one-way ratchet toward higher sentences...

Should Gradualism Have Prevailed in Dobbs?

Richard M. Re

Gradualism should have won out in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health , exerting gravitational influence on the majority and dissenters alike. In general...

Intimate Privacy in a Post-Roe World

Danielle K. Citron

Now that the Supreme Court has revoked the constitutional right to reproductive autonomy, we must reckon with the risks that our surveillance economy...

An Expert-Sourced Measure of Judicial Ideology

Kevin Cope

We introduce the first ideology measure covering every non-Supreme-Court Article III judge on a single scale. The dataset comprises dynamic, interval...

Public-Law Litigation at a Crossroads: Article III Standing and 'Tester' Plaintiffs

Rachel Bayefsky

An upcoming Supreme Court case on Article III standing and disability presents critical questions about the future of litigation that promotes...

From Bad to Worse: Cyberstalking, Threats, and Free Speech

Danielle K. Citron

Cyber stalking involves repeated, often relentless targeting of someone with abuse. Death and rape threats may be part of a perpetrator’s playbook...

Constraining prosecutors and other advocates who become judges: A commentary on Berryessa et al. (2022)

Gregory Mitchell

Berryessa et al. (2022) consider how prior experience as a criminal prosecutor may influence judicial behaviour, but their concerns about prior...

Trump out on bail – a criminal justice expert explains the system of cash bail

Megan T. Stevenson

For several days, former President Donald Trump and his 18 co-defendants in a Georgia election interference case trickled into the Fulton County Jail...

How to Legitimate the Prosecution of Politicians

Saikrishna Prakash

Ian Ayres

We propose the creation of a Prosecutor Jury—a mechanism designed to balance the need to hold politicians accountable for their crimes, and the need...

The One Remaining Identity the Supreme Court Is Willing to Protect

Craig Konnoth

There is one group that the court does not put into an identity straitjacket—those claiming religious exemptions.

For Now, Court Is Cool with California in Charge

Ruth Mason

Michael S. Knoll

Law students frequently find the U.S. Supreme Court’s Dormant Commerce Clause doctrine confusing. That is no surprise given the sharp disagreement...

Does Cash Bail Deter Misconduct?

Megan T. Stevenson

Aurelie Ouss

Courts routinely use low cash bail as a financial incentive to ensure that released defendants appear in court and abstain from crime. This can create...

Are Progressives in Denial About Progress? Yes, but So Is Almost Everyone Else

Gregory Mitchell

Philip E. Tetlock

Scott Lilienfeld warned that psychology’s ideological uniformity would lead to premature closure on sensitive topics. He encouraged psychologists to...

Do Federal or State Prosecutors Get To Go First in Trying Trump? A Law Professor Untangles The Conflict

Darryl K. Brown

A federal grand jury in Florida indicted former President Donald Trump on June 8, 2023, on multiple criminal charges related to classified documents...

The Supreme Court Just Dealt a Major Blow to Corporate Mandates

James Nelson

Micah J. Schwartzman

Elizabeth Sepper

On Thursday, the Supreme Court subtly transformed the rights of religious workers in America. Under the guise of “clarifying” a nearly 50-year-old...

Military Academies Can Still Consider Race in Admissions, But the Rest of the Nation’s Colleges and Universities Cannot, Court Rules

Kimberly J. Robinson

Vinay Harpalani

Kristine Bowman

In a 6-3 ruling on Thursday, June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the use of race in college admissions at Harvard and the University of...

Pretrial risk assessment, risk communication, and racial bias

S. A. Zottola

S. L. Desmarais

D. K. Stewart

...

We examined how the presentation of risk assessment results and the race of the person charged affected pretrial court actors’ recommendations to...

Opinion: The Supreme Court is making religion an all-purpose excuse for ignoring the law

Looking for a federal law to be declared unconstitutional? Religion may well be your best bet -- and that's true regardless of how "real" your...