Compulsive Gambling and the Insanity Defense: United States v. Torniero and United States v. Lewellyn

Richard J. Bonnie;

Scholarship

Compulsive Gambling and the Insanity Defense: United States v. Torniero and United States v. Lewellyn

Richard J. Bonnie

PUBLISHER

Newsletter of the American Academy of Psychiatry & Law

DATE

1984-04

UVA Law Faculty Affiliations

Richard J. Bonnie

Citation

Richard J. Bonnie, Compulsive Gambling and the Insanity Defense: United States v. Torniero and United States v. Lewellyn, Newsletter of the American Academy of Psychiatry & Law 5-8 (April, 1984).

More in This Category

Bad Faith Prosecution
Ann Woolhandler

Michael G. Collins
In our increasingly polarized society, claims that prosecutions are politically motivated, racially motivated, or just plain arbitrary are more... MORE
The Dangerous Few: Taking Seriously Prison Abolition and Its Skeptics
Thomas Frampton
Prison abolition, in the span of just a few short years, has established a foothold in elite criminal legal discourse. But the basic question of how... MORE
Pretrial Detention and the Value of Liberty
Megan T. Stevenson
How dangerous must a person be to justify the state in locking her up for the greater good? The bail reform movement, which aspires to limit pretrial... MORE

The Biden Administration Cracks Down on Ransomware
Kristen Eichensehr
Following several significant ransomware attacks against U.S. companies last summer, the Biden administration has acted internationally and... MORE
McCleskey Accused: Justice Powell and the Moral Price of Institutional Pride
Josh Bowers
Writing for the Supreme Court in McCleskey v. Kemp, Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr. authored a maximalist decision that transcended capital practice and... MORE
The Future of Police Reform
Rachel Harmon
The future of police reform might be best predicted by looking to the recent past, where we find countless proposals for change. But merely looking... MORE

Algorithmic Fairness, Algorithmic Discrimination
Thomas B. Nachbar
There has been an explosion of concern about use of computers to make decisions – from hiring to lending approvals to setting prison terms –... MORE
Asymmetric Subsidies and the Bail Crisis
Rich Hynes

John F. Duffy
When individuals are arrested or indicted for a crime, governments have legitimate interests in assuring that those individuals show up for future... MORE
What If Nothing Works? On Crime Licenses, Recidivism, and Quality of Life
Josh Bowers
We accept uncritically the “recidivist premium,” which is the notion that habitual offenders are particularly blameworthy and should be punished... MORE

Arrests: What Are They Good For?
Rachel Harmon
Even police critics often assume that arrests are essential to policing. This Article challenges that assumption and argues that arrests should be... MORE
Algorithmic Risk Assessment in the Hands of Humans
Megan T. Stevenson
We evaluate the impacts of adopting algorithmic risk assessments as an aid to judicial discretion in felony sentencing. We find that judges'... MORE
The Law of the Police
Rachel Harmon
The Law of the Police is the first book to explore the complex array of federal, state, and local legal rules that govern police encounters with the... MORE

The Trial Lottery
Darryl K. Brown
Juries are the lifeblood of our criminal justice system. As the Framers clearly understood, and as the Supreme Court has consistently reaffirmed in... MORE
Does Cash Bail Deter Misconduct?
Megan T. Stevenson
Courts routinely use low cash bail as a financial incentive to ensure that released defendants appear in court and abstain from crime. This can... MORE
Changing the Law to Change Policing: First Steps
Rachel Harmon
Recent events have brought to the fore longstanding concerns about the nature of policing in the United States and how it undermines racial equity.... MORE

Lost in Translation: “Risks,” “Needs,” and “Evidence” in Implementing the First Step Act
John T. Monahan
In this article, we focus on two highly problematic issues in the manner in which the First Step Act of 2018 is being implemented by the Bureau of... MORE
For Cause: Rethinking Racial Exclusion and the American Jury
Thomas Frampton
Peremptory strikes, and criticism of the permissive constitutional framework regulating them, have dominated the scholarship on race and the jury for... MORE
Valid or Voodoo? A Qualitative Study of Attorney Perceptions of Risk Assessment in Sentencing and Plea Bargaining
John T. Monahan
Prior research largely has explored judicial attitudes toward risk assessment in sentencing. Little is known about how other court actors,... MORE

Scholarship

Compulsive Gambling and the Insanity Defense: United States v. Torniero and United States v. Lewellyn

UVA Law Faculty Affiliations

Citation

More in This Category

ABOUT

APPLY

ACADEMICS

SERVICES

PEOPLE

CAREERS

NEWS & EVENTS

COMMUNITY