Grounds for Professional Abstention in Capital Cases: A Reply to Brodsky
Responds to S. L. Brodsky's (see record 1990-18249-001) critique of R. J. Bonnie's (see record 1990-18247-001) views on forensic evaluation of capital defendants and condemned prisoners by discussing whether objective assessment is possible in a context where personal values are so strongly held, and whether the criteria for assessing competency are too vague. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)