Richard Bonnie
John Monahan

Mandated Community Treatment: Beyond Outpatient Commitment

CO-AUTHORS Paul S. Appelbaum, Pamela S. Hyde, Henry J. Steadman, and Marvin S. Swartz
PUBLISHER
Psychiatric Services
DATE
2001-09
 

Abstract

Outpatient commitment, although often viewed as merely an extension of inpatient commitment, is only one of a growing array of legal tools used to mandate treatment adherence. The authors describe various forms of mandated community treatment. People with severe and chronic mental disorders often depend on goods and services provided by the social welfare system. Benefits disbursed by representative payees and the provision of subsidized housing have both been used as leverage to ensure treatment adherence. Many discharged patients are arrested for criminal offenses. Favorable disposition of their cases by a mental health court may be tied to participation in treatment. Under outpatient commitment statutes, judges can order committed patients to comply with prescribed treatment. Patients may attempt to maximize their control over treatment in the event of later deterioration by executing an advance directive. The ideological posturing that currently characterizes the field must be replaced by an evidence-based approach.

Citation

Paul S. Appelbaum et al., Mandated Community Treatment: Beyond Outpatient Commitment, 52 Psychiatric Services 1198-1205 (2001).
 

More in This Category