Scholarship

Scholarship masthead

Managed by the UVA Law Library, the scholarship repository houses research and publications from current and past faculty.

 

New Research

Faculty Scholarship

Kenneth S. Abraham, “Incomplete” Insurance Coverage, 26 Connecticut Insurance Law Journal 115-143 (2020). view
Ashley S. Deeks, Will Cyber Autonomy Undercut Democratic Accountability?, 96 International Law Studies 464-504 (2020). view
John C. Harrison, Seila Law and the Law of Judicial Review, University of Chicago Law Review Online 77-86 (2020). view
David A. Martin, Taming Immigration: The 64th Henry J. Miller Distinguished Lecture Series Remarks, 36 Georgia State University Law Review 971-1003 (2020). view
Frederick Schauer, The Hostile Audience Revisited, in David E. Pozen The Perilous Public Square: Structural Threats to Free Expression Today, Columbia University Press, 65-83 (2020). view
Pierre-Hugues Verdier, Global Banks on Trial: U.S. Prosecutions and the Remaking of International Finance, Oxford University Press (2020). view
Frederick Schauer, Oliver Wendell Holmes, the Abrams Case, and the Origins of the Harmless Speech Tradition, 51 Seton Hall Law Review 205-224 (2020). view
George Rutherglen, Reconstruction in Legal Theory, 105 Minnesota Law Review Headnotes 95-110 (2020). view
Danielle K. Citron, Cyber Mobs, Disinformation, and Death Videos: The Internet As It Is (and As It Should Be) (reviewing Nick Drnaso, Sabrina) 118 Michigan Law Review 1073-1093 (2020). view
Sarah H. Cleveland & Paul B. Stephan, Introduction: The Roles of the Restatements in U.S. Foreign Relations Law, in Paul B. Stephan & Sarah H. Cleveland The Restatement and Beyond: The Past, Present, and Future of U.S. Foreign Relations Law, Oxford University Press, 1-20 (2020). view
Philip J. Cook & Kimberly D. Krawiec, Kidney Donation and the Consent of the Poor, 66 Loyola Law Review 23-32 (2020). view
Joy Milligan, Plessy Preserved: Agencies and the Effective Constitution, 129 Yale Law Journal 924-1019 (2020). view
Cathy Hwang & Yaron Nili, Shareholder-Driven Stakeholderism, University of Chicago Law Review Online (2020). view
Barbara E. Armacost, Celebrating Robert Cochran and the Future of “Embodied” Christian Legal Scholarship, 47 Pepperdine Law Review 397-417 (2020). view
Michael Doran, Redefining Tribal Sovereignty for the Era of Fundamental Rights, 95 Indiana Law Journal 87-144 (2020). view
Frederick Schauer & Barbara A. Spellman, Probabilistic Causation in the Law, 176 Journal of Institutional & Theoretical Economics 4-17 (2020). view
Frederick Schauer, Social Science and the Philosophy of Law, in John Tasioulas The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Law, Cambridge University Press, 95-114 (2020). view
Cale Jaffe & Michael A. Livermore, EPA’s Nondiscretionary Duties to Act under Section 115, in Michael Burger Combating Climate Change with Section 115 of the Clean Air Act: Law and Policy Rationales, Edward Elgar, 192-206 (2020). view
Steven D. Walt & William D. Warren, Commercial Law: Selected Statutes, Foundation Press (2020 ed. 2020). view
Kenneth S. Abraham, Insurance, in Andrew S. Gold et al. The Oxford Handbook of The New Private Law, Oxford University Press, 445-461 (2020). view
Lee C. Buchheit & G. Mitu Gulati, The Argentine Collective Action Clause Controversy , 15 Capital Markets Law Journal 464-473 (2020). view
Aharon Barak, David S. Law & Yeong-Chin Su, Constitutional Adjudication in Comparative Perspective, in Yen-Tu Su Constitutional Interpretation: Theory and Practice, Vol. 10, Academia Sinica (2020). view
Payvand Ahdout, "Neutral" Gray Briefs, 43 Fordham International Law Journal 1263-1271 (2020). view
G. Mitu Gulati & Ugo Panizza, Alternative Solutions to the Odious Debt Problem , LIV Annals of the Fondazione Einaudi 153-168 (2020). view
Margaret Foster Riley, Necessity, Use, and Care of Laboratory Dogs at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Academies Press (2020). view
Thomas Frampton, Why Do Rule 48(a) Dismissals Require 'Leave of Court'?, 73 Stanford Law Review Online 28-37 (2020). view
Andrew Hayashi, Myopic Consumer Law, 106 Virginia Law Review 689-763 (2020). view
Michael S. Knoll & Ruth Mason, The Dormant Foreign Commerce Clause After Wynne, 39 Virginia Tax Review 357-418 (2020). view
John Norton Moore, The Thirteenth Waldemar A. Solf and Marc L. Warren Chair Lecture in National Security Law: Defending Defense in the Law of Jus Ad Bellum, 228 Military Law Review 405-419 (2020). view
Frederick Schauer, Lon Fuller and the Rule of Law, in Michael Sevel Routledge Handbook of the Rule of Law, Routledge (2020). view
Thomas Frampton & Kelly Orians, In Defense of Reentry: A Response to Shreya Subramani’s Productive Separations, 47 Fordham Urban Law Journal 993-1008 (2020). view
Sarah Seo & G. Edward White, Five Recommendations, 10 J.L.: Periodical Laboratory of Legal Scholarship 310-320 (2020). view
Saikrishna Prakash, Against Constitution by Convention, 108 California Law Review 1975-1994 (2020). view
Kenneth S. Abraham & Daniel Schwarcz, Insurance Law and Regulation: Cases and Materials, Foundation Press (7 ed. 2020). view
Stephen J. Choi, G. Mitu Gulati & Robert E. Scott, Anticipating Venezuela’s Debt Crisis: Hidden Holdouts and the Problem of Pricing Collective Action Clauses, 100 Boston University Law Review 253-300 (2020). view
David S. Law & Ryan Whalen, Constitutional Amendments Versus Constitutional Replacements: An Empirical Perspective, in Xenophon Contiades & Alkmene Fotiadou Routledge Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Change, Routledge, 74-100 (2020). view
Rich Hynes, Unique Risk and Bankruptcy Valuation, 168 University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online 49-77 (2020). view
Theresa Arnold et al., The Myth of Optimal Expectation Damages , 104 Marquette Law Review 141-182 (2020). view
Douglas Guynn, Cale Jaffe & Phillip D., Payne, U.S. Supreme Court Amici Curiae Brief in United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association, Nos. 18-1584 & 18-1587, (2020). view
Thomas Frampton, For Cause: Rethinking Racial Exclusion and the American Jury, 118 Michigan Law Review 785-839 (2020). view
Lawrence B. Solum, Cooley’s Constitutional Limitations and Constitutional Originalism, 18 Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 49-74 (2020). view
Michael S. Knoll & Ruth Mason, Steiner v. Utah: Designing a Constitutional Remedy, 95 Tax Notes State 845-850 (2020). view
Caleb E. Nelson, Intervention, 106 Virginia Law Review 271-393 (2020). view
Frederick Schauer, Free Speech Overrides, 2020 University of Chicago Legal Forum 255-271 (2020). view
Lawrence B. Solum & Cass R. Sunstein, Chevron as Construction, 105 Cornell Law Review 1465-1487 (2020). view
Richard J. Bonnie, Ariane Lewis & Thaddeus Pope, Is There a Right to Delay Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria?, 77 JAMA Neurology 1347-1348 (2020). view
Michael G. Collins & Ann Woolhandler, Inmate Constitutional Claims and the Scienter Requirement, 98 Washington University Law Review 645-669 (2020). view
John C. Harrison, Dissenting, in Jack M. Balkin What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation’s Top Legal Experts Rewrite America’s Same-Sex Marriage Decision, Yale University Press, 262-280 (2020). view
Amy Coney Barrett et al., The Federalist Society Presents, Showcase Panel II: Why, or Why Not, Be an Originalist?, 69 Catholic University Law Review 683-721 (2020). view
Craig Konnoth, Medicalization and the New Civil Rights, 72 Stanford Law Review 1165-1268 (2020). view

Pages

Pages

Kenneth S. Abraham, “Incomplete” Insurance Coverage, 26 Connecticut Insurance Law Journal 115-143 (2020). view
Risa Goluboff, On Firsts, Feminism, and the Future of the Legal Profession, Women & Law 81-93 (2020). view
Michael A. Livermore, Introduction: Threats to the Role of Economics in Environmental Policymaking, 28 New York University Environmental Law Journal 49-59 (2020). view
Dayna Bowen Matthew, Structural Inequality: The Real COVID-19 Threat to America’s Health and How Strengthening the Affordable Care Act Can Help, 108 Georgetown Law Journal 1679-1716 (2020). view
Micah J. Schwartzman & Nelson Tebbe, Establishment Clause Appeasement, 2019 Supreme Court Review 271-311 (2020). view
G. Edward White, Cheating in Baseball: Reflections on Electronic Sign-Stealing, 23 The Green Bag Second Series 131-143 (2020). view
Michael Doran, The Equal-Protection Challenge to Federal Indian Law, 6 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law & Public Affairs 1-74 (2020). view
Cale Jaffe & Michael A. Livermore, EPA’s Nondiscretionary Duties to Act under Section 115, in Michael Burger Combating Climate Change with Section 115 of the Clean Air Act: Law and Policy Rationales, Edward Elgar, 192-206 (2020). view
Sarah H. Cleveland & Paul B. Stephan, Introduction: The Roles of the Restatements in U.S. Foreign Relations Law, in Paul B. Stephan & Sarah H. Cleveland The Restatement and Beyond: The Past, Present, and Future of U.S. Foreign Relations Law, Oxford University Press, 1-20 (2020). view
Saikrishna Prakash, Resolved, The Unitary Executive Is a Myth: Con, in Richard J. Ellis & Michael Nelson Debating the Presidency: Conflicting Perspectives on the American Executive, CQ Press, 24-35 (5 ed. 2020). view
Joseph Blocher, G. Mitu Gulati & Kim Oosterlinck, Why Did Belgium Pay Leopold’s Bonds?, 83 Law and Contemporary Problems 49-70 (2020). view
Jay Butler, The Corporate Keepers of International Law, 114 American Journal of International Law 189-220 (2020). view
Sandra G. Mayson & Megan T. Stevenson, Misdemeanors by the Numbers, 61 Boston College Law Review 971-1044 (2020). view
Barbara E. Armacost, Celebrating Robert Cochran and the Future of “Embodied” Christian Legal Scholarship, 47 Pepperdine Law Review 397-417 (2020). view
Ashley S. Deeks, Will Cyber Autonomy Undercut Democratic Accountability?, 96 International Law Studies 464-504 (2020). view
Rachel Harmon, Policing, Protesting, and the Insignificance of Hostile Audiences, in David E. Pozen The Perilous Public Square: Structural Threats to Free Expression Today, Columbia University Press, 96- (2020). view
Keith Carlson, Michael A. Livermore & Daniel N. Rockmore, The Problem of Data Bias in the Pool of Published U.S. Appellate Court Opinions, 17 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 224-261 (2020). view
Charles W. McCurdy, The Problem of General Constitutional Law: Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, and the Supreme Court of the United States, 1868-1878, 18 Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 1-12 (2020). view
Micah J. Schwartzman, Must Laws Be Motivated by Public Reason?, in Silje Langvatn, Mattias Kumm, & Wojciech Sadurski Public Reason and Courts, Cambridge University Press, 45-65 (2020). view
Michal Barzuza & Eric Talley, Long-Term Bias, 2020 Columbia Business Law Review 104-191 (2020). view
Steven D. Walt & William D. Warren, Commercial Law: Selected Statutes, Foundation Press (2020 ed. 2020). view
Jesse H. Choper et al., Constitutional Law: Cases, Comments, and Questions, 2020 Supplement, West Academic (13 ed. 2020). view
Joy Milligan, Plessy Preserved: Agencies and the Effective Constitution, 129 Yale Law Journal 924-1019 (2020). view
Curtis A. Bradley, Ashley S. Deeks & Jack L. Goldsmith, Foreign Relations Law: Cases and Materials , Wolters Kluwer (7 ed. 2020). view
Michael Doran, Redefining Tribal Sovereignty for the Era of Fundamental Rights, 95 Indiana Law Journal 87-144 (2020). view
John C. Harrison, Section 706 of the Administrative Procedure Act Does Not Call for Universal Injunctions or Other Universal Remedies, 37 Yale Journal on Regulation Bulletin 37-47 (2020). view
Michael A. Livermore, Polluting the EPA’s Long Tradition of Economic Analysis, 70 Case Western Reserve Law Review 1063-1080 (2020). view
Jonathan Z. Cannon, Judicial Review in the New Age of Deference, in Michael Burger Combating Climate Change With Section 115 of the Clean Air Act: Law and Policy Rationales, Edward Elgar, 101-124 (2020). view
Barbara A. Spellman & Charles Weaver, Memory and the Law, in M.J. Kahana & A.D. Wagner Handbook of Human Memory - Volume II: Applications, Oxford University Press (2020). view
Deborah Hellman, Sex, Causation, and Algorithms: Equal Protection in the Age of Machine Learning, 98 Washington University Law Review 481-523 (2020). view
Richard J. Bonnie, Ariane Lewis & Thaddeus Pope, Is There a Right to Delay Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria?, 77 JAMA Neurology 1347-1348 (2020). view
Sarah Seo & G. Edward White, Five Recommendations, 10 J.L.: Periodical Laboratory of Legal Scholarship 310-320 (2020). view
Jesse H. Choper et al., Leading Cases in Constitutional Law: A Compact Casebook for a Short Course, West Academic (2020 ed. 2020). view
Amy Coney Barrett et al., The Federalist Society Presents, Showcase Panel II: Why, or Why Not, Be an Originalist?, 69 Catholic University Law Review 683-721 (2020). view
Craig Konnoth, Normative Bases of Medical Civil Rights, in I. Glenn Cohen et al. Disability, Health, Law and Bioethics, Cambridge University Press, 200-210 (2020). view
Craig Konnoth, Medical Civil Rights as a Site of Activism: A Reply to Critics, 73 Stanford Law Review Online (2020). view
Frederick Schauer, Rules, Defeasibility, and the Psychology of Exceptions, in Lorand Bartels & Federica Paddeu Exceptions in International Law, Oxford University Press, 55-64 (2020). view
Ashley S. Deeks, Introduction to the Symposium: How Will Artificial Intelligence Affect International Law?, 114 AJIL Unbound 138-140 (2020). view
John C. Harrison, Seila Law and the Law of Judicial Review, University of Chicago Law Review Online 77-86 (2020). view
Jens Frankenreiter & Michael A. Livermore, Computational Methods in Legal Analysis, 16 Annual Review of Law & Social Science 39-57 (2020). view
John T. Monahan, Nicholas Scurich & Jennifer Skeem, Impact of Risk Assessment on Judges’ Fairness in Sentencing Relatively Poor Defendants, 44 Law & Human Behavior 51-59 (2020). view
George Rutherglen, Self-Portrait in a Complex Mirror: Reflections on The Making of a Justice: Reflections on My First 94 Years by John Paul Stevens, 106 Virginia Law Review Online 28-46 (2020). view
Lawrence B. Solum, Themes from Fallon on Constitutional Theory, 18 Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 287-351 (2020). view
Ashley S. Deeks, Secrecy Surrogates, 106 Virginia Law Review 1395-1477 (2020). view
G. Edward White, From the Third to the Fourth Restatement of Foreign Relations: The Rise and Potential Fall of Foreign Affairs Exceptionalism, in Paul B. Stephan & Sarah H. Cleveland The Restatement and Beyond: The Past, Present, and Future of U.S. Foreign Relations Law, Oxford University Press, 23-66 (2020). view
Michael G. Collins & Ann Woolhandler, Inmate Constitutional Claims and the Scienter Requirement, 98 Washington University Law Review 645-669 (2020). view
Saikrishna Prakash, Against Constitution by Convention, 108 California Law Review 1975-1994 (2020). view
Philip J. Cook & Kimberly D. Krawiec, Kidney Donation and the Consent of the Poor, 66 Loyola Law Review 23-32 (2020). view
Craig Konnoth & Gabriel Scheffler, Can Electronic Health Records Be Saved?, 46 American Journal of Law & Medicine 7-19 (2020). view
Paul B. Stephan, The Waning of the Federal Common Law of Foreign Relations, in Paul B. Stephan & Sarah A. Cleveland The Restatement and Beyond: The Past, Present, and Future of U.S. Foreign Relations Law, Oxford University Press, 179-202 (2020). view

Pages