Scholarship

Scholarship masthead

Managed by the UVA Law Library, the scholarship repository houses research and publications from current and past faculty.

 

New Research

Faculty Scholarship

Pages

Pages

Richard C. Schragger, Micah J. Schwartzman & Nelson Tebbe, The Bladensburg Peace Cross Case Sends the Message That Some Citizens Are Less Valued Than Others, Washington Post (February 26, 2019). view
Lawrence B. Solum, Artificially Intelligent Law, BioLaw Journal 53 (2019). view
Naomi R. Cahn & Amy Ziettlow, The Sandwich Generation on Wheels: Tips for Long-Distance Family Caregivers, Institute for Family Studies Blog (February 21, 2019). view
Saikrishna Prakash, Of Synchronicity and Supreme Law, 132 Harvard Law Review, 1220–1299 (2019). view
Ashley S. Deeks, Can Congress Constitutionally Restrict the President’s Troop Withdrawals?, Lawfare (February 6, 2019). view
Naomi R. Cahn, Small Change? How Our Daily Purchases Can Make a Difference, Forbes (January 17, 2019). view
Cale Jaffe, Virginia’s Uranium Mining Battle Flips Traditional Views of Federal and State Power, Conversation (January 11, 2019). view
Bertrall Ross, Administrative Constitutionalism as Popular Constitutionalism, 167 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1783–1822 (2019). view
Kenneth S. Abraham & G. Edward White, Torts Without Names, New Torts, and the Future of Liability for Intangible Harm, 68 American University Law Review, 2089–2144 (2019). view
Kimberly J. Robinson, A Congressional Right to Education: Promises, Pitfalls, and Politics, in Kimberly Jenkins Robinson A Federal Right to Education: Fundamental Questions for Our Democracy, NYU Press, 186–207 (2019). view
Micah J. Schwartzman, Lying as a Political Wrong, 38 Law & Philosophy 507–515 (2019). view
Naomi R. Cahn, Alyssa DiRusso & Susan N. Gary, Wills, Trusts, and Estates in Focus, Wolters Kluwer (2019). view
Michal Barzuza, Proxy Access for Board Diversity, 99 Boston University Law Review, 1279–1299 (2019). view
Kimberly Kessler Ferzan, The Means Principles and Optimific Wrongs, in Heidi M. Hurd Moral Puzzles and Legal Perplexities: Essays on the Influence of Larry Alexander, Cambridge University Press, 333–349 (2019). view
Dayna Bowen Matthew, On Charlottesville, 105 Virginia Law Review, 269–341 (2019). view
Frederick Schauer, Dialogue and Its Discontents, in Geoffrey Sigalet, Grégoire C. N. Webber, & Rosalind Dixon Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions, Cambridge University Press, 423–435 (2019). view
Naomi R. Cahn, Review of Hertz & Nelson, <em>Random Families</em> (reviewing Rosanna Hertz & Margaret K. Nelson, Random Families: Genetic Strangers, Sperm Donor Siblings, and the Creation of New Kin) 56 Society 524 (2019). view
Lawrence B. Solum, Lies and Free Speech Values, 38 Law & Philosophy 495 (2019). view
Richard L. Hasen & Douglas Laycock, Modern American Remedies: Cases and Materials, Wolters Kluwer (5 ed. 2019). view
David S. Law, Constitutional Dialects: The Language of Transnational Legal Orders, in Gregory C. Shaffer, Tom Ginsburg, & Terence C. Halliday Constitution-Making and Transnational Legal Order, Cambridge University Press, 110–155 (2019). view
Bertrall Ross & Douglas M. Spencer, Passive Voter Suppression: Campaign Mobilization and the Effective Disfranchisement of the Poor, 114 Northwestern University Law Review, 633–704 (2019). view
Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan, eds., The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law, Palgrave Macmillan (2019). view
Brandon L. Garrett, Alexander Jakubow & John T. Monahan, Judicial Reliance on Risk Assessment in Sentencing Drug and Property Offenders: A Test of the Treatment Resource Hypothesis, 46 Criminal Justice & Behavior 799–810 (2019). view
Kimberly J. Robinson, The Essential Questions Regarding a Federal Right to Education, in Kimberly Jenkins Robinson A Federal Right to Education: Fundamental Questions for Our Democracy, NYU Press, 1–32 (2019). view
Micah J. Schwartzman, Official Intentions and Political Legitimacy: The Case of the Travel Ban, in Jack Knight & Melissa Schwartzberg Political Legitimacy, NYU Press, 201–230 (2019). view
Daniel J. Capra, Graham C. Lilly & Stephen A. Saltzburg, Principles of Evidence, West (8 ed. 2019). view
Kimberly Kessler Ferzan, Defense and Desert: When Reasons Don’t Share, 55 San Diego Law Review, 265–290 (2019). view
Frederick Schauer, Every Possible Use of Language?, in Lee C. Bollinger & Geoffrey R. Stone The Free Speech Century, Oxford University Press, 3–47 (2019). view
Leslie Kendrick, The Book Has Two Faces: Trevor Ross’s Writing in Public: Literature and the Liberty of the Press in Eighteenth-Century Britain, 6 Critical Analysis of Law 174 (2019). view
Aditya Bamzai, Delegation and Interpretive Discretion: <em>Gundy</em>, <em>Kisor</em>, and the Formation and Future of Administrative Law, 133 Harvard Law Review, 164–199 (2019). view
Kimberly Kessler Ferzan, Stand Your Ground, in Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzen The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law, Palgrave Macmillan, 731–749 (2019). view
Jason S. Johnston, The EPA’s Conflicted “Science” on Fine Particle Mortality, in Patrick J. Michaels & Terence Kealey Scientocracy: The Tangled Web of Public Science and Public Policy, Cato Institute, 257–289 (2019). view
Dayna Bowen Matthew, Two Threats to Precision Medicine Equity, 29 (supp. 3) Ethnicity & Disease 629–640 (2019). view
Kimberly J. Robinson, ed., A Federal Right to Education: Fundamental Questions for Our Democracy, NYU Press (2019). view
Micah J. Schwartzman & Jocelyn Wilson, The Unreasonableness of Catholic Integralism, 56 San Diego Law Review, 1039–1067 (2019). view
Brandon L. Garrett & Gregory Mitchell, The Impact of Proficiency Testing Information and Error Aversions on the Weight Given to Fingerprint Evidence, 37 Behavioral Sciences & the Law 195–210 (2019). view
Frederick Schauer, Intentions in Tension, in Heidi M. Hurd Moral Puzzles and Legal Perplexities: Essays on the Influence of Larry Alexander, Cambridge University Press, 206–220 (2019). view
Pierre-Hugues Verdier, The New Financial Extraterritoriality, 87 George Washington Law Review, 239–314 (2019). view
Michael D. Gilbert, The Law and Economics of Entrenchment, 54 Georgia Law Review, 64–109 (2019). view
Douglas Laycock, Book Review (reviewing Robin Fretwell Wilson ed., The Contested Place of Religion in Family Law) 61 Journal of Church and State 332 (2019). view
Charles Barzun, Constructing Originalism or: Why Professors Baude and Sachs Should Learn to Stop Worrying and Love Ronald Dworkin, 105 Virginia Law Review Online, 128–148 (2019). view
Joe Fore, “A Court Would Likely (60-75%) Find”: Defining Verbal Probability Expressions in Predictive Legal Analysis, 16 Legal Communication & Rhetoric 49–84 (2019). view
Leslie Kendrick, Lies and Free Speech Values, 38 Law & Philosophy 495–506 (2019). view
George Rutherglen, The Thirteenth Amendment in Legal Theory, 104 Cornell Law Review Online, 160–172 (2019). view
Janet L. Dolgin & Lois Shepherd, Bioethics and the Law, Aspen (4 ed. 2019). view
Kristen Eichensehr, Digital Switzerlands, 167 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 665–732 (2019). view
Paul B. Stephan, One Voice in Foreign Relations and Federal Common Law, 60 Virginia Journal of International Law, 1–49 (2019). view
Richard J. Bonnie et al., Pain Management and Opioid Regulation: Continuing Public Health Challenges, 109 American Journal of Public Health 31–34 (2019). view
Leslie Kendrick, A Fixed Star in Shifting Skies: Barnette and Civil Rights Law, 13 Florida International University Law Review, 729–740 (2019). view
John T. Monahan & Jeffrey Swanson, Lawyers at the Peak of Their Careers: A 30-Year Longitudinal Study of Job and Life Satisfaction, 16 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4–25 (2019). view

Pages