Students need to make satisfactory academic progress in order to continue receiving federal student aid. In other words, students must make good enough grades, and complete enough classes (credits, hours, etc.), to keep moving toward successfully completing their degree or certificate in an acceptable time period.
For purposes of determining student eligibility assistance under Title IV of the Higher Education Act (HEA) of 1965, an institution must establish reasonable standards for measuring whether a student is maintaining satisfactory academic progress. On October 29, 2010, the Secretary of Education published final rules aimed at improving the integrity of programs authorized under Title IV of the HEA, as amended.
It is important to note that satisfactory academic progress standards for financial aid purposes may differ from the academic progress policies of the University and of each individual school. All students are encouraged to become familiar with the satisfactory academic progress policy and its impact on student financial aid eligibility.
Evaluating students' satisfactory academic progress is required by federal regulation. The outcome of the evaluation and its impact on students' financial aid eligibility overrides all other University policies or statements regarding a student's academic standing.
The Law School’s SAP policy is accessible here.
The U.S. Department of Education does not believe it is appropriate for students who are not making progress towards program completion to continue to receive Title IV, HEA aid. Students who experience circumstances that interfere with their ability to meet the satisfactory academic progress standards may appeal their SAP status. The intent of the appeal process is to provide information to the Law School Financial Aid Appeals Committee that is not captured on the student’s academic record but has impacted the student’s academic progress.
Students who appeal their SAP status must provide a detailed explanation for why they are not making satisfactory academic progress and must also present convincing evidence of their ability to meet the SAP standards and to finish their degree program. The satisfactory academic progress policy does not limit the number of times students may appeal an SAP status during a student's career; however, it is the Law School Financial Aid Appeals Committee’s objective to ensure that Title IV, HEA aid is awarded to students who demonstrate a capacity for completing their degree program.
Students who wish to appeal their Financial Aid Suspension must complete and submit the following:
- Satisfactory Academic Progress Appeal
- Academic plan (page 1) (page 2) developed by the Law School's Student Records Office and student that, if followed, will ensure that the student is able to meet the satisfactory academic progress standards by a specific point in time
- If applicable, documentation from third party to support your explanation (i.e. letter from physician or counselor)
Once the completed appeal is received, the information will be reviewed by the Law School Financial Aid Appeals Committee. Based upon the documentation submitted, the Committee will approve or deny the appeal. Students will be notified of the Committee’s decision by email no later than one month after the completed appeal is received.
Additional information regarding the university’s SAP policies is available from Student Financial Services.