Marbury v. Madison and the Concept of Judicial Deference

Aditya Bamzai;

Scholarship

Marbury v. Madison and the Concept of Judicial Deference

Aditya Bamzai

PUBLISHER

Missouri Law Review

DATE

2016

SSRN Website

UVA Law Faculty Affiliations

Aditya Bamzai

Abstract

This paper, prepared for a symposium on administrative law hosted by the University of Missouri School of Law, analyzes the relationship between Chief Justice Marshall's opinion in Marbury v. Madison and the concept of judicial deference to executive statutory interpretation.

SSRN Website

Citation

Aditya Bamzai, <em>Marbury v. Madison</em> and the Concept of Judicial Deference, 81 Missouri Law Review, 1057–1073 (2016).

More in This Category

Why Can’t We Take Secession Seriously?
Cynthia L. Nicoletti
Sandy Levinson has always taken secession arguments seriously. This is, in my eyes, one of his great virtues. There are very few scholars who would... MORE
'Our Experiences Make Us Who We Are': Lessons from Thomas Ruffin and Dirk Hartog
Jessica Lowe
It was 1804, and Thomas Ruffin, future Chief Justice of the North Carolina Supreme Court, was having doubts about slavery. Ruffin was a young student... MORE
The Small and Diversifying Network of Legal Scholars: A Study of Co-Authorship from 1980–2020
Andrew Hayashi
This Essay reports the first comprehensive network analysis of legal scholars connected through co-authorship. If legal scholarship was ever a... MORE

Continuity and Change at UVA Law
Risa Goluboff
At the University of Virginia School of Law, we have recently commemorated the bicentennial of our founding, the centennial of coeducation and the... MORE
Immunity Rules
John C. Harrison
Analysis based on Hohfeld’s analytical system shows that liability rules, as defined by Guido Calabresi and A. Douglas Melamed, are a false category... MORE
Hohfeld on Legal Language
Frederick Schauer
Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld is well-known for maintaining that various terms in law – “rights,” most prominently – confusingly designate a number of quite... MORE

Risa Goluboff: Response to Dirk Hartog’s “Four Fragments” In a Flow Chart and Three Venn Diagrams
Risa Goluboff
After reading “Four Fragments,” I returned to the journal I kept as a requirement of Dirk’s course. There, in the very first entry dated February 6,... MORE
The Hope of Ketanji Brown Jackson's Nomination
Kimberly J. Robinson
For two surreal days this week, I sat next to the family of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson during hearings on her nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court.... MORE
Soccer in American Culture: The Beautiful Game’s Struggle for Status
G. Edward White
In Soccer in American Culture: The Beautiful Game's Struggle for Status, G. Edward White seeks to answer two questions. The first is why the sport of... MORE

Forward
Risa Goluboff
This symposium about the future of legal pedagogy could not be more timely. Its four thought-provoking papers raise a constellation of questions... MORE
Tort Law and the Construction of Change: Studies in the Inevitability of History
G. Edward White

Kenneth S. Abraham
Tort Law and the Construction of Change studies the interaction of law and social change in American history. Tort law—civil law made by judges, not... MORE
William Henry Trescot, Pardon Broker
Cynthia L. Nicoletti
This essay details the efforts of William Henry Trescot, "executive agent" for South Carolina, to secure pardons for the state's lowcountry elite... MORE

The Global Evolution of Foreign Relations Law
Kevin Cope

Pierre-Hugues Verdier

Mila Versteeg
The constitutional rules that govern how states engage with international law have profound implications for foreign affairs, yet we lack... MORE
Wars of Conquest in the Twenty-First Century and the Lessons of History – Crimea, Panama, and John Bassett Moore
Paul B. Stephan
This article uses history to explore how prominent international lawyers explain seemingly transgressive state behavior. It begins with the Russian... MORE
The Certificate of Division and the Early Supreme Court
Michael G. Collins
The history and development of Supreme Court review over state courts in the early Republic is well known. The equally important history and... MORE

The Common Law and Critical Theory
Charles Barzun
Because common-law doctrines have long served as targets for critical theorists, it would be easy to see the common law and critical theory as... MORE
The Tale of Two Harts; A Schlegelian Dialectic
Charles Barzun
This essay, written for a symposium honoring John Henry Schlegel, is part intellectual history, part philosophical polemic. It first briefly compares... MORE
"I Am Better at Narrative Than Analytic History": Schlegel's Version of Intellectual History
G. Edward White
It has been a stimulating and exhausting task to reread much of John Henry Schlegel's efforts, over several decades, to work out his approach to... MORE

Scholarship

Marbury v. Madison and the Concept of Judicial Deference

UVA Law Faculty Affiliations

Abstract

Citation

More in This Category

ABOUT

APPLY

ACADEMICS

SERVICES

PEOPLE

CAREERS

NEWS & EVENTS

COMMUNITY