Human rights discourse has become central to the global debates about treatment of and solutions for refugees and displaced persons. Following the expansion of rights-oriented terminology generally, advocates for displacees have increasingly framed their arguments in human rights terms. Many believe that human rights discourse can help mobilize humanitarian solutions for people fleeing violence and persecution. However, we argue that the backlash against human rights institutions and organizations within some communities may render this strategy ineffective and even reinforce exclusionary attitudes among host communities. Based on socio-legal analysis of the refugee label and human rights discourse within Israeli society, we demonstrate how the strategic use of this terminology by pro-refugee NGOs portrays displacees as a security and identity threat to local communities. We suggest alternative framings that might better achieve advocates’ goal of protection.
Citation
Kevin Cope & Shiri Krebs, Can Rights Discourse Diminish Support for Displaced Persons?, 20 Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 279–292 (2022).
More in This Category
An upcoming Supreme Court case on Article III standing and disability presents critical questions about the future of litigation that promotes...
More
This chapter looks to the role of the market as a mediating institution in the culture wars that so polarize American society. Rather than seeing...
More
The nascent field of comparative migration law can do more than classify different approaches to migration law; it is well-positioned to address...
More
Aurelie Ouss
Courts routinely use low cash bail as a financial incentive to ensure that released defendants appear in court and abstain from crime. This can create...
More
The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Immigration Law is perhaps the first book-length treatment of the subject of comparative immigration law. The...
More
Robert Cooter
This comprehensive textbook applies economic analysis to public law. The economic analysis of law has revolutionized legal scholarship and teaching in...
More
Over the past twenty-five years, a growing number of European countries have enacted laws granting citizenship to individuals and their descendants...
More
Charles Crabtree
A growing experimental literature suggests that international law appears to have a larger impact on public opinion than constitutional law. Because...
More
The United States has taken legislative and executive actions to address human rights violations committed by the People's Republic of China (PRC)...
More
On October 14, 2021, the United States was elected to the UN Human Rights Council (HRC), fulfilling a pledge President Joseph R. Biden Jr. made during...
More
Shiri Krebs
Human rights discourse has become central to the global debates about treatment of and solutions for refugees and displaced persons. Following the...
More
“Speak Up” and similar studies documented something that many thought they already knew about large law school classes: Male students talk a heck of a...
More
The constitutional rules that govern how states engage with international law have profound implications for foreign affairs, yet we lack...
More
Recent Supreme Court decisions have severely curtailed the reach of the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), making it nearly impossible to hold multinational...
More
Admiralty offers a promising analogue to modern human rights law. Rooted in longstanding traditions of judge-made law and reference to customary...
More
Ugo Panizza
Unnoticed in the literature on sovereign bonds, an innovation has been taking place over the past decade and a half. Starting with a single issuance...
More
In theory, birthright citizenship has been well established in U.S. law since 1898, when the Supreme Court held in United States v. Wong Kim Ark that...
More
Jennifer L. Doleac
We evaluate the impacts of adopting algorithmic risk assessments as an aid to judicial discretion in felony sentencing. We find that judges' decisions...
More