Danielle Citron

Addressing the Harm of Total Surveillance: A Reply to Professor Neil Richards

CO-AUTHORS David Gray
PUBLISHER
Harvard Law Review Forum
DATE
2013
 

Abstract

In his insightful article, "The Dangers of Surveillance," 126 Harvard Law Review 1934 (2013), Neil Richards offers a framework for evaluating the implications of government surveillance programs that is centered on protecting "intellectual privacy." Although we share his interest in recognizing and protecting privacy as a condition of personal and intellectual development, we worry in this essay that, as an organizing principle for policy, "intellectual privacy" is too narrow and politically fraught. Drawing on other work; we, therefore, recommend that judges, legislators, and executives focus, instead, on limiting the potential of surveillance technologies to effect programs of broad and indiscriminate surveillance. 

 

 

 

Citation

Danielle K. Citron & David Gray, Addressing the Harm of Total Surveillance: A Reply to Professor Neil Richards, 126 Harvard Law Review Forum 262-274 (2013).
 

More in This Category