Twenty-six years after Employment Division v. Smith, the lower courts remain divided about its meaning. What does it mean for a law to be “generally applicable”? The Ninth Circuit recently upheld a regulation on facts as extreme as those in Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah (1993). But other courts have held that a law is not generally applicable if it allows even one secular exception that undermines the state’s asserted interests in regulating religion. Close analysis of Smith and Lukumi reveals that the one-secular-exception interpretation is correct. The Court’s discussions of the “object” of a law, of religious “gerrymanders,” and of discrimination “because of” religion, appear only with respect to neutrality; none of these concepts are even mentioned with respect to general applicability. The Court’s reaffirmance of the unemployment-benefits cases show that even very narrow exceptions make a law less than generally applicable. Sound policy reasons support this more literal understanding of general applicability. Exempting secular but not religious activities that undermine alleged government interests deprives religious minorities of vicarious political protection and demonstrates a forbidden value judgment: the exempted secular activities are more valuable, more deserving of legal protection, than the unexempted exercise of religion. This understanding of general applicability implements, in the face of regulatory complexity, a rule prohibiting discrimination against the free exercise of religion.
Liberalism is back on its heels, pushed there by political movements in the United States and Europe and by the critiques of legal scholars and...
Cyber stalking involves repeated, often relentless targeting of someone with abuse. Death and rape threats may be part of a perpetrator’s playbook...
Fifty years ago, federal and state lawmakers called for the regulation of a criminal justice “databank” connecting federal, state, and local agencies...
In the last few years, the Supreme Court has upended its doctrine of religious freedom under the First Amendment. The Court has explicitly rejected...
The demise of Roe v. Wade has raised a host of religious liberty questions that were submerged prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v...
Looking for a federal law to be declared unconstitutional? Religion may well be your best bet -- and that's true regardless of how "real" your...
Section 230 is finally getting the clear-eyed attention that it deserves. No longer is it naive to suggest that we revisit the law that immunizes...
The recently enacted Respect for Marriage Act is important bipartisan legislation that will protect same-sex marriage should the Supreme Court...
Violations of intimate privacy can be never ending. As long as nonconsensual pornography and deepfake sex videos remain online, privacy violations...
As faculty members at the University, we are writing to object to The Cavalier Daily’s recent editorial arguing that former vice president Mike Pence...