The Founders were not textualists. The letter of the law mattered quite a bit. But, as William Blackstone noted, interpretation also required the consideration of purpose, reason, and intent—what he and many others called “spirit.” This Article makes several contributions. First, spirit was a potent factor, for it not only helped resolve textual ambiguities, it also could trump the letter of the law. Specifically, spirit could extend the meaning of the law beyond its letter—extensive interpretation. And spirit could restrict the meaning suggested by the letter of the law—restrictive interpretation. Second, spirit was a familiar tool, applicable to constitutions, laws, treaties, judicial precedents, and even executive rules. Third, spirit was not the peculiar province of the courts. Instead, spirit was more democratic, for everyone made free use of it. Early federal legislators, including James Madison, invoked spirit to make sense of the Constitution. Executives, including George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, and many others, utilized spirit to make sense of the Constitution, laws, and treaties. John Marshall deployed spirit to trump the letter before he was Chief Justice and continued invoking spirit while on the bench. This excavation of Founding-era practices bears on modern debates. To begin with, the Founders eschewed the extreme fixation on text that characterizes modern textualism. Relatedly, given that the Founders routinely considered spirit, textualists should reassess their claim that the Constitution mandates modern textualist precepts. One should not use a late twentieth-century theory to make sense of late eighteenth-century documents, including the Constitution. Lastly, originalists of all stripes should refine their understanding of originalist methodology, for a proper conception of originalism should perhaps reflect the actual practices of the Founders. Public meaning originalists, original methods originalists, and every other species of originalist must reckon with spirit’s central role in early American practice. For too long, we have been in the thrall of a textualism that is at war with the pervasive use of spirit at the Founding.
Although the U.S. Constitution is widely described as lacking enforceable social rights, a recent line of cases from the Ninth Circuit recognizes a...
After an impatient wait, the U.S. Supreme Court finally handed down its opinion in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, the tariffs case, on Friday, Feb...
At points in American history, there have been significant, even massive shifts in constitutional understandings, doctrines, and practices. Apparently...
Many disdain the use of consequences in legal interpretation. Yet it turns out that interpreters have long used consequences, particularly...
This chapter discusses the repugnant income generating activities (“RIGA”) of phase I medical research, sex work, and plasma donation. Though each is...
We introduce altruism into standard models of bargaining and explore its implications for the Coase Theorem. A strict interpretation of the Coase...
Article II of the Constitution says that “[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” Of course, the...
Until he joined the U.S. government in 1934, Robert H. Jackson had been a lawyer in private practice in Upstate New York who was admitted to the bar...
Earlier this year, President Donald Trump suggested that there could be “an interesting problem” with the Treasury market that would justify non...
This casebook provides an overview of the wide range of legal and ethical issues facing lawyers in practice. As did prior editions, the Seventh...
Few constitutional issues have been as significant to the first 100 days of the second Trump Administration as the question whether the President may...
“In a time when disinformation is being laundered through government agencies, the responsibility to protect evidence-based care falls to courageous...
Constitutional scholars have long observed that the term “constitutional crisis” is overused. Pundits and scholars routinely use it to describe...
A distinct set of six institutions and traditions makes the country hard to subjugate to an authoritarian’s will.
Psychology and law, by their nature, are deeply entwined. Both are about human behavior – understanding it, modifying it, regulating it. Psychology’s...
Although ethical critiques of markets are longstanding, modern academic debates about the ‘moral limits of markets’ (MLM) tend to be fairly limited in...
For the over half-million people currently homeless in the United States, the U.S. Constitution has historically provided little help: it is strongly...