About
With more than 30 faculty members who are experts in constitutional law, UVA Law School offers an unparalleled variety of lecture courses, seminars and clinics in the field. Courses cover topics such as the First Amendment, administrative law, presidential power, federal courts, police and the law, election law, civil rights, separation of powers, race and the law, and more.
Latest Research
More
More
More
More
More
More
Many disdain the use of consequences in legal interpretation. Yet it turns out that interpreters have long used consequences, particularly...
For the over half-million people currently homeless in the United States, the U.S. Constitution has historically provided little help: it is strongly...
Trump v. United States’s discovery of broad immunity has rendered the presidency more imperial and unaccountable. This Article tackles four questions...
Erensu Altan
Individual duties—like the responsibility to defend the country, pay taxes, or obey the law—are frequently included in national constitutions, but...
During times of crisis, governments often consider policies that may promote safety, but that would require overstepping constitutionally protected...
Jeffrey Stautberg
This essay considers the future of public-private collaboration in the wake of the Murthy v. Missouri litigation, which cast doubt on the...
Faculty Director(s)
Charles Barzun
Professor of Law
Joel B. Piassick Research Professor of Law
Director, Program on Legal and Constitutional History
Research
Many disdain the use of consequences in legal interpretation. Yet it turns out that interpreters have long used consequences, particularly...
For the over half-million people currently homeless in the United States, the U.S. Constitution has historically provided little help: it is strongly...
Trump v. United States’s discovery of broad immunity has rendered the presidency more imperial and unaccountable. This Article tackles four questions...
Erensu Altan
Individual duties—like the responsibility to defend the country, pay taxes, or obey the law—are frequently included in national constitutions, but...
During times of crisis, governments often consider policies that may promote safety, but that would require overstepping constitutionally protected...
Jeffrey Stautberg
This essay considers the future of public-private collaboration in the wake of the Murthy v. Missouri litigation, which cast doubt on the...
This Article develops a new way of understanding the law in order to address contemporary debates about judicial practice and reform. The...
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, the Supreme Court acknowledged the difficulties in applying its constitutional originalism to the...
In an earlier article titled The Executive Power of Removal, we contended that Article II gives the President a constitutional power to remove...
Aaron L. Nielson
The Supreme Court has twice held since 2020 that statutory restrictions on the President’s removal power violate Article II of the U.S. Constitution...
In recent years, several popularly elected leaders have moved to consolidate their power by eroding checks and balances. Courts are commonly the...
An upcoming Supreme Court case on Article III standing and disability presents critical questions about the future of litigation that promotes...
Constitutional theory is a mess. Disagreements about originalism and living constitutionalism have become intractable. Constitutional theorists make...
Moore v. United States raises the question whether unrealized gains, such as an increase in property value or a stock portfolio, constitute “incomes...
Gradualism should have won out in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, exerting gravitational influence on the majority and dissenters alike. In general...
The United States has granted reparations for a variety of historical injustices, from imprisonment of Japanese Americans during the Second World War...
Today, legal culture is shaped by One Big Question: should courts, particularly the US Supreme Court, have a lot of power? This question is affecting...
Bridget Fahey
It is conventional wisdom that the states are free—within wide constitutional parameters—to structure their governments as they want. This Article...
Whether constitution-making should be constrained has long been debated, but little is known about whether it is possible. We make several...
National constitutions codify provisions on a wide range of topics, ranging from presidential term limits to the country’s flag. But are all...
This Essay reports data on the impact of Bruen and its predecessor, Heller, on gun rights cases. Put mildly, the impact was substantial, not only in...
The decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard [SFFA], invalidating the use of race in college admissions, reignites...
Cass R. Sunstein
At points in American history, there have been significant, even massive shifts in constitutional understandings, doctrines, and practices. Apparently...
The Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917—or the “TWEA”—is the precursor to the modern statutory sanctions framework of the United States. Though...
In Chile, many commentators, academics and political leaders have spent years arguing that the limited nature of the social rights in the national...
In our increasingly polarized society, claims that prosecutions are politically motivated, racially motivated, or just plain arbitrary are more common...
When federal judges are called on to adjudicate separation-of-powers disputes, they are not mere arbiters of the separation of powers. By resolving a...
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court distinguished between different kinds of reliance interests — some that would...
Whether the Constitution grants the President a removal power is a longstanding, far-reaching, and hotly contested question. Based on new materials...
Resident Faculty
Resident Faculty
Disability law, health law and antidiscrimination law
Federal courts, separation of powers, constitutional law, criminal procedure
Criminal procedure, civil rights litigation, torts and constitutional law
Administrative law, civil procedure, computer crime, federal courts, national security law
Evidence, torts, jurisprudence and legal history, constitutional law
Federal courts, constitutional law, civil procedure, legal theory
International law, national security, foreign relations, law of war
Intellectual property, patents, administrative law
Race and law, constitutional law, employment discrimination
Criminal law, civil rights, race
Election law, law and economics, legislation, statutory interpretation
Civil rights, constitutional history and constitutional law
Criminal law, criminal procedure, policing and civil rights
Affirmative action and equal protection, and constitutional law and theory
First Amendment, constitutional law and torts
Health policy, LGBTQ rights
Comparative and empirical study of public law, courts and legal texts
Property, corporations and land conservation, nonprofit organizations
Constitutional law, antitrust and communications regulation, national security
Constitutional law and civil procedure, federal courts
Constitutional law, administrative law, election law
Separation of powers, presidential powers, constitutional law
Criminal procedure, federal courts and constitutional law
Education law, civil rights, affirmative action, desegregation and integration, race, sexual discrimination and harassment
Separation of church and state, property, local government and land use
Law and religion, jurisprudence and political philosophy
Legal theory, constitutional theory, procedure, philosophy of law
Comparative law and human rights
Appellate litigation, federal courts
Legal history, constitutional law, torts
Federal court system and civil procedure
Other Faculty
Brian J. Bill
Lecturer
Holly Clement
Lecturer
Andrew Goldstein
Lecturer
Timothy J. Heaphy
Lecturer
Mark Herring
Lecturer
Ian C. Kalish
Lecturer
Timothy Longo Sr.
Lecturer
Associate Vice President for Safety and Security and Chief of Police, University of Virginia
John J. Martin
Research Assistant Professor of Law
Karsh Center for Law and Democracy Fellow
Jeremy C. Marwell
Lecturer
Andrew Oldham
Lecturer
James Quarles
Lecturer
Gabe Rottman
Lecturer
Matthew Sanderson
Lecturer
Cate Stetson
Lecturer
Co-Instructor, Appellate Litigation Clinic
Amul R. Thapar
Lecturer
Stefan Underhill
Lecturer
Ashley Waters
Lecturer
Lin Weeks
Lecturer
Aaron Zebley
Distinguished Fellow, Karsh Center for Law and Democracy
Lecturer
Curriculum
The Law School’s curriculum features two concentrations with courses in constitutional law and legal history. The following is a list of courses offered during 2022-25. Numbers in parentheses indicate which academic year(s) the courses were offered, i.e., 2022-23 is coded (23), 2023-24 is (24) and 2024-25 is (25). (SC) stands for short course and (YR) stands for yearlong.
Courses and Seminars
Administrative Law (23,24,25)
Advanced Administrative Law (SC) (23)
Advanced Topics in Federal Courts Seminar (23)
Advanced Topics in the First Amendment (Religion Clauses) (25)
After Dobbs (SC) (23)
Agencies in Court (SC) (25)
Appellate Litigation Clinic (YR) (23,24,25)
Business and Governmental Tort Liability (23)
Civil Rights and Antidiscrimination Law (23,25)
Civil Rights Litigation (23,24,25)
Civil War and the Constitution (24)
Climate and Debt (24)
Comparative Constitutional Law (23,24,25)
Comparative Freedom of Speech Law Seminar (24,25)
Congress, Oversight and the Separation of Powers (SC) (24)
Constitutional Law and Economics (23,24)
Constitutional Law II: Freedom of Religion (23,24,25)
Constitutional Law II: Freedom of Speech and Press (23,24,25)
Constitutional Law II: Poverty (23)
Constitutional Law II: Survey of Civil Liberties (23,24)
Constitutionalism: Nation, Culture and Constitutions (23,24)
Courts (23,24)
Criminal Adjudication (23,24,25)
Criminal Investigation (23,24,25)
Criminal Procedure Survey (23,24,25)
Designing Democracy: Participation (23)
Designing Democracy: Representation (24)
Education Law Survey (23)
Federal Courts (23,24,25)
Federal Sentencing (SC) (23,24,25)
Federalism (SC) (23,24)
Founders and Foes (SC) (23)
History of American Federalism (23,25)
History of the American Administrative State (24)
International Arbitration (24)
Law and Inequality Colloquium (23,24,25)
Law and Riots (23,24,25)
Law of the Police I: Rules, Rights and Regulation (23,25)
Law, Inequality and Education Reform (25)
Legislation (23,24)
Legislation and Regulation (23,25)
Litigating the 2024 Presidential Election (25)
Monetary Constitution Seminar (23,24,25)
Monument Litigation (SC) (25)
Native American Law (24)
Organizational DEI Programs (SC) (24)
Pain and the Law (25)
Parental Choice in K-12 Education (SC) (23)
Perspectives on Sovereignty - Native American Law (23,25)
Practical Perspectives on Policing: Fair and Effective Policymaking by Law Enforcement (SC) (24)
Privacy (23,24,25)
Privacy Law and Theory Seminar (23,24,25)
Privacy Torts (24,25)
Property, the Police Power and Emergencies (23,24,25)
Public Law Colloquium (25)
Race, Education and Opportunity (23)
Racial Justice and Law (23,24,25)
Regulation of Political Advocacy Seminar (24,25)
Regulation of the Political Process (23,25)
Regulatory Law and Policy (23,25)
Religious Freedom and Reproductive Rights (24)
Religious Freedom: Current Challenges (24)
Reproductive Rights and Justice (SC) (24,25)
School Desegregation, School Integration (24)
SCOTUS: Opacity and Privilege (SC) (25)
Second Amendment and Gun Violence Colloquium (25)
Separation of Powers in the Federal Courts Seminar (23,24)
State Attorneys General (24,25)
State Constitutionalism (25)
Supreme Court Justices and the Art of Judging (23,24)
Supreme Court: October Term (24,25)
The Constitution, Democracy and U.S. History (25)
The Executive Branch: Comparative and Political Aspects (SC) (24)
The Great Writ (SC) (24,25)
The January 6th Investigation and How Courts Can Shape Congress’ Power to Investigate (SC) (24)
The Institutional Supreme Court (SC) (24)
The Mueller Report and the Role of the Special Counsel (SC) (23,24,25)
The Right to Protest (SC) (24)
Clinics
Appellate Litigation Clinic (YR) (23,24,25)
First Amendment Clinic (YR) (23,24,25)
Project for Informed Reform Clinic (YR) (23,24,25)
State and Local Government Policy Clinic (YR) (23,24,25)
Supreme Court Litigation Clinic (YR) (23,24,25)
Professor John C. Jeffries Jr. ’73, a former dean who ensured the Law School’s financial footing and set the stage for its future, is marking 50 years on the faculty.
Stanford Law School professor Pamela S. Karlan, an expert on voting and the political process and a former UVA Law professor, delivers the McCorkle Lecture.
Clinics
Students in the Appellate Litigation, First Amendment and Supreme Court Litigation clinics grapple with constitutional issues from real or potential litigation. These clinics often give students a firm grounding in issues they may tackle as clerks or as practicing attorneys.
Appellate Litigation Clinic
This yearlong clinic allows 12 students to engage in the hands-on practice of appellate litigation through actual cases before various federal circuit and/or state courts of appeals. The students are teamed up and assigned to handle primary responsibility for work on at least one appellate case during the course of the year. In addition, the students work together as a small law firm to provide secondary-level assistance to each other.
Civil Rights Clinic
Students work on cases that have potential to provide real and concrete relief and legal support to people and communities that have been harmed by the criminalization of poverty and other forms of discrimination or deprivation of rights.
First Amendment Clinic
Run in conjunction with the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression and the law firm Baker Hostetler, the yearlong First Amendment Clinic gives students practical legal experience involving timely free speech and press issues. Students work in teams to conduct legal research, meet with clients and co-counsel, and draft legal memoranda and briefs. Assignments typically involve appellate-level litigation, although there are occasional trial-level opportunities. Students also work on a variety of non-litigation projects, such as reviewing proposed municipal ordinances for potential First Amendment flaws.
Supreme Court Litigation Clinic
Working in teams, students in this yearlong clinic handle actual cases, from seeking Supreme Court review to briefing on the merits. Students identify candidates for Supreme Court review; draft petitions for certiorari, amicus merits briefs and party merits briefs; and attend moots and Supreme Court arguments.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear three cases with clients represented by clinics at the University of Virginia School of Law.
During his Constitutional Law course, UVA Law professor Bertrall Ross discusses the history of the 13th and 14th Amendments, the Dred Scott case and the Slaughter-House cases.
Student organizations such as the American Constitution Society and the Federalist Society often host speakers on constitutional law topics and provide networking opportunities for those interested in the field. Recent events have included a talk focusing on the anatomy of a Supreme Court case by an experienced litigator, a lecture by the Obama campaign general counsel Robert Bauer '76 on the anti-election-reform movement, and the annual Supreme Court roundup, in which Virginia Law professors analyzes cases from the past court term.
In a new book, Professor George Rutherglen of the University of Virginia School of Law looks at three of the most high-profile recent Supreme Court decisions — on abortion, affirmative action and religious accommodations — and attempts to predict how they might play out in future employment litigation.
Does the U.S. Supreme Court need more oversight in light of recent ethics concerns? UVA Law professors Amanda Frost and Richard M. Re join host Dean Risa Goluboff to discuss whether more rules are needed.
News
June 5, 2025
Justices resolved a split in how courts handle employment discrimination claims in a unanimous decision Thursday for the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic at the University of Virginia School of Law.
April 11, 2025
A team of students finished second in this year’s International and European Tax Moot Court competition, among other accolades for the University of Virginia School of Law community.
April 10, 2025
U.S. Deputy Solicitor General Edwin S. Kneedler ’74, this year’s recipient of the Thomas Jefferson Foundation Medal in Law, turned the spotlight on his fellow federal employees Thursday and encouraged students to pursue public service during a talk at the University of Virginia School of Law.
February 20, 2025
A new paper co-authored by Professor Mitu Gulati of the University of Virginia School of Law shows that the U.S. Supreme Court is increasingly dominated by a handful of elite lawyers who can influence the final decision and the path of public policy.
February 14, 2025
Constitutional litigation scholar Pamela S. Karlan will discuss recent challenges to government accountability for the McCorkle Lecture at the University of Virginia School of Law on Feb. 24.
October 9, 2024
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear three cases with clients represented by clinics at the University of Virginia School of Law.
September 19, 2024
University of Virginia School of Law faculty are available to speak to the media about the 2024 Supreme Court term.
September 11, 2024
Faculty colleagues of University of Virginia School of Law professor Frederick Schauer, who died earlier this month, recall their favorite works and how his scholarship influenced them.
September 2, 2024
The University of Virginia School of Law community remembers Professor Frederick Schauer, a world-renowned free speech and constitutional law expert who also wrote influential works on evidence, rules and legal theory.
August 1, 2024
Professor Amanda Frost of the University of Virginia School of Law examines proposals to enact term limits and a binding code of ethics for U.S. Supreme Court justices.
July 17, 2024
New courses offered this fall at the University of Virginia School of Law include Artificial Intelligence and Democracy, International Settlement of Disputes, and Single People and the Law.
July 12, 2024
In light of the recent Grants Pass ruling, Professors Kevin Cope and Mila Versteeg at the University of Virginia School of Law explain how courts have shifted public policy on the homeless.
July 11, 2024
In the wake of a shifting U.S. Supreme Court, University of Virginia School of Law professor Saikrishna Prakash’s new paper with Cass Sunstein looks at how and why radical constitutional change occurs.
July 10, 2024
Take a summer road trip through local “landmarks” in case law throughout Virginia and Washington, D.C., selected and summarized by University of Virginia School of Law faculty.
July 5, 2024
University of Virginia School of Law faculty discuss news-making rulings from the U.S. Supreme Court term that ended Monday.
July 1, 2024
Meet Dean Leslie Kendrick ’06, who brings her expertise gained from serving as vice dean — as well her knowledge of freedom of speech, torts law and John Milton — to her new role at the University of Virginia School of Law.
June 13, 2024
In a new book, Professor George Rutherglen of the University of Virginia School of Law looks at three of the most high-profile recent Supreme Court decisions — on abortion, affirmative action and religious accommodations — and attempts to predict how they might play out in future employment litigation.
May 16, 2024
University of Virginia School of Law faculty are available to speak to the media about the 2023 Supreme Court term.
April 17, 2024
University of Virginia law professor A. E. Dick Howard ’61, who is retiring as the longest-serving professor in the University’s history, helped reshape Virginia’s constitution and those from around the world.
April 12, 2024
Roger L. Gregory, the first Black judge to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and this year’s recipient of the Thomas Jefferson Foundation Medal in Law, explained his view of the Constitution and the value of collegiality in a talk at the University of Virginia School of Law.
University of Virgnia School of Law professor Rachel Bayefsky has written a new book arguing for greater judicial recognition of dignity.
Judge Roger L. Gregory of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit gives a talk and participates in a Q&A to mark receiving the Thomas Jefferson Foundation Medal in Law. Dean Risa Goluboff served as moderator for the event.