About
UVA Law is home to outstanding scholars of civil rights and civil liberties. Their expertise spans the equal protection clause in the 14th Amendment, civil rights statutes, the religion clauses and the speech and press clauses of the First Amendment, and more. Disputes over equality and discrimination continue to reverberate in legislatures and courts nationwide. The freedom of speech has become an ever more important and contested right within our society, and the religion clauses have become an active and controversial area in Supreme Court jurisprudence. Scholars at the Law School are at the forefront of all of these debates, in law reviews and philosophical journals, as well as in courthouses and the public square.
This Article tells the inside story of the rise, spread, and evolution of trust and safety. We bring unique perspectives to this story. One of us...
The Supreme Court’s current approach to religious freedom reflects an asymmetric view of religious motivation. Under the Free Exercise Clause, the...
Some egalitarian theories of religious freedom allow for the possibility of religious exemptions. Theories of equal value hold that when the...
An important piece of the “speech-tort” picture has been almost completely missing from doctrinal and policy analysis: the role played by liability...
Faculty Director(s)
Research
This Article tells the inside story of the rise, spread, and evolution of trust and safety. We bring unique perspectives to this story. One of us...
The Supreme Court’s current approach to religious freedom reflects an asymmetric view of religious motivation. Under the Free Exercise Clause, the...
Some egalitarian theories of religious freedom allow for the possibility of religious exemptions. Theories of equal value hold that when the...
An important piece of the “speech-tort” picture has been almost completely missing from doctrinal and policy analysis: the role played by liability...
Congress and state legislatures are showing renewed interest in youth privacy, proposing myriad new laws to address data extraction, addiction...
Over the last decade, the Supreme Court has revolutionized the law of religious freedom. At this point, the picture is reasonably clear. The Court has...
In the last few years, the Supreme Court has upended its doctrine of religious freedom under the First Amendment. The Court has explicitly rejected...
Content moderation is typically viewed as an affront to free expression. When companies remove online abuse, they face accusations of censorship. Lost...
Fifty years ago, federal and state lawmakers called for the regulation of a criminal justice “databank” connecting federal, state, and local agencies...
Liberalism is back on its heels, pushed there by political movements in the United States and Europe and by the critiques of legal scholars and...
In Matter of Giuliani, the New York Appellate Division held that Rudy Giuliani’s knowingly false statements of fact during the period after the 2020...
Cyber stalking involves repeated, often relentless targeting of someone with abuse. Death and rape threats may be part of a perpetrator’s playbook...
This amicus curiae brief was filed 12 June 2024 in the Indiana Supreme Court on behalf of Professors Caroline Corbin, B. Jessie Hill, Elizabeth Sepper...
The demise of Roe v. Wade has raised a host of religious liberty questions that were submerged prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v...
Section 230 is finally getting the clear-eyed attention that it deserves. No longer is it naive to suggest that we revisit the law that immunizes...
Violations of intimate privacy can be never ending. As long as nonconsensual pornography and deepfake sex videos remain online, privacy violations...
The protection of intimate privacy isn’t at odds with free expression. At times, we prioritize one value over the other, but, more often, intimate...
This piece is part of a forthcoming volume entitled Painting Constitutional Law, which pairs artist Xavier Cortada’s series of paintings, “May It...
This Article uses controversies over government-sponsored religious symbols and Confederate monuments to consider the appropriate constitutional...
Are some liberal justices on the Supreme Court engaged in appeasement as a strategy of judicial decisionmaking? In prior work, we specified a...
A robust public debate is currently underway about the responsibility of online platforms. We have long called for this discussion, but only recently...
An emerging intellectual and ideological critique of liberalism is coinciding with a significant transformation of the American law of church and...
In this Article, we ask whether some liberal justices have followed a strategy of judicial appeasement in recent cases involving religious freedom...
Fiction and visual representations can alter our understanding of human experiences and struggles. They help us understand human frailties and...
It has become increasingly common in recent years for conservative Christian thinkers to describe cultural and legal conflicts in terms of a battle...
Catholic integralism has reemerged as a radical critique of liberalism and as a potential source of justification for illiberal regimes. Integralists...
Resident Faculty
Courses and Seminars
Numbers in parentheses indicate the academic year(s) courses were offered: 2023-24 is coded (24), 2024-25 is coded (25) and 2025-26 is coded (26).
Advanced Topics in the First Amendment (Religion Clauses) (25)
Civil Rights and Antidiscrimination Law (25)
Civil Rights Litigation (24,25,26)
Comparative Constitutional Law (24,25,26)
Comparative Freedom of Speech (25)
Comparative Freedom of Speech Law Seminar (24)
Constitutionalism: Nature, Culture and Constitutions (24)
Constitutional Law II: Freedom of Religion (25,26)
Constitutional Law II: Freedom of Speech and Press (24)
Constitutional Law II: Religious Liberty (24)
Constitutional Law II: Survey of Civil Liberties (24,26)
Designing Democracy: Representation (24)
Government Secrecy (24)
Law and Inequality Colloquium (24,25)
Law and Riots (24,25,26)
Law of the Police I: Rules, Rights and Regulation (25)
Law, Inequality and Education Reform (25,26)
Monetary Constitution Seminar (24,25,26)
Online Privacy, Freedom of Speech and Platform Regulation in Europe (SC) (26)
Pretrial Litigation Skills: Civil Rights (24)
Privacy (24,25,26)
Privacy Law and Theory Seminar (24,25,26)
Privacy Torts (24,25)
Property, Police Power and Emergencies (24,25)
Race, Class and Democratic Legitimacy (SC) (24)
Race, Meritocracy and Justice on Campus (SC) (25)
Racial Justice and Law (24,25,26)
Regulation of Political Advocacy Seminar (24,25,26)
Regulation of the Political Process (25,26)
Religious Freedom and Reproductive Rights (24)
Religious Freedom: Current Challenges (24)
Rule of Law and its Threats (25)
School Desegregation, School Integration (24)
State and Local Government Law (24)
State Constitutionalism (25)
The Constitution, Democracy and U.S. History (25)
The Great Writ (SC) (24,25)
The Right to Protest (SC) (24)
Clinics
Clinics
First Amendment Clinic
This yearlong clinic is supervised by lawyers at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and supported in part by a gift from the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression. In the clinic, students work closely with RCFP lawyers on timely and vital matters involving free speech and press freedom. The support of the Thomas Jefferson Center and the partnership with RCFP enable students to gain practical legal experience on cutting-edge First Amendment issues. Students work as a team in conducting legal research, meeting with clients and co-counsel, and drafting legal memoranda and briefs. Assignments involve both appellate-level and trial-level litigation, but more frequently the former, including the U.S. Supreme Court.
Appellate Litigation Clinic
This yearlong clinic allows 12 students to engage in the hands-on practice of appellate litigation through actual cases before various federal circuit and/or state courts of appeals. The students are teamed up and assigned to handle primary responsibility for work on at least one appellate case during the course of the year. In addition, the students work together as a small law firm to provide secondary-level assistance to each other.
Civil Rights Clinic
Students work on cases that have potential to provide real and concrete relief and legal support to people and communities that have been harmed by the criminalization of poverty and other forms of discrimination or deprivation of rights.
Supreme Court Litigation Clinic
Working in teams, students in this yearlong clinic handle actual cases, from seeking Supreme Court review to briefing on the merits. Students identify candidates for Supreme Court review; draft petitions for certiorari, amicus merits briefs and party merits briefs; and attend moots and Supreme Court arguments.
News
Events
Join ACS, BLSA, Professor Michael Gilbert and Melody Barnes, former director of the White House Domestic Policy Council under President Barack Obama and founding executive director of the Karsh Institute of Democracy, for a discussion about the future of voting rights after the Supreme Court’s decision in Callais, as well as Watson and NRSC. Food will be provided.
The Innocence Project’s annual Wrongful Conviction Day will feature client Messiah Johnson, who was fully exonerated and compensated by the commonwealth of Virginia for his 20 years of wrongful conviction. Food will be provided.
The Federalist Society is kicking off its Spring Speaker Series with a fireside chat featuring UVA Law’s very own Professor Danielle Citron and Professor Jamil Jaffer, the founder of the National Security Institute at George Mason Law School. Join for a wide-ranging discussion of recent development in privacy law, moderated by Matthew Hamilton. A Q&A with audience members will follow the chat, and lunch will be provided.
Join the Federalist Society for a preview of the upcoming Supreme Court term. Institute for Justice attorneys, as well as chapter booster Professor Julia Mahoney, will look at the cases the court will consider and the cases they think the court should hear. They will also answer questions from attendees. Lunch will be served.
Professor Micah Schwartzman ’05 will discuss reproductive rights in Judaism. Food will be provided.
Food will be provided
Kenneth L. Wainstein, under secretary for intelligence and analysis for the Department of Homeland Security, will discuss homeland security intelligence. The discussion, moderated by law professor Ashley Deeks, director of UVA’s National Security Law Center and a Miller Center faculty senior fellow, will cover election security as well as provide insights into this lesser known but vital player in the U.S. intelligence community.
Legal scholar Khiara M. Bridges will deliver the keynote address at the seventh annual Shaping Justice conference, “Safeguarding Bodily Autonomy: Examining the Intersections of Health and Justice.” Bridges will speak at 5 p.m. in Caplin Pavilion.
Aimed at inspiring students and lawyers to promote justice through public service, the student-run conference will also feature an awards ceremony to honor Laurel Sakai ’11 and Anne Swerlick ’77 for their roles in serving the public.
Moderated by UVA Law professor Craig Konnoth, a panel of experts will discuss reconciling LGBTQ+ rights and religious freedom. The speakers are Christine Durham, senior of counsel for litigation, Wilson Sonsini, and former chief justice of the Utah Supreme Court; William Eskridge, John A. Garver Professor of Jurisprudence, Yale Law School; Ria Tabacco Mar, director of the ACLU’s Women’s Rights Project; and Robin Fretwell Wilson, director, Institute of Government and Public Affairs and Mildred Van Voorhis, Jones Chair in Law, Illinois College of Law.
Speaker Molly Conger, a local anti-racist activist and journalist, worked to uncover and publicize activities of white supremacists ahead of the Unite the Right rally. Her most recent work includes live-tweeting Sines v. Kessler. Food will be provided.
This conference marks the 50th anniversary of the passing of Title IX. Practitioners, scholars and other experts on Title IX will discuss current related issues, from sexual violence and abuses of power in higher education to access to sports for transgender students. Department of Education official Suzanne Goldberg will deliver the keynote address.
Sponsoring firms are Covington, Morgan Lewis, Thompson & Horton LLP, and Thompson Esquire.